C# update

[andrewducker]

I skipped over control structures and Boolean logic (which I'd covered 6 times before leaving University, in Maths, Physics, Philosophy and Computing (at least 3 times)) and went straight on to Exceptions, which I'd not encountered before. Suddenly I was taking in new things and *pow* I'm enjoying myself again.

I've now covered "Overloading Constructors" and am on to "static Methods and Data" which I've not seen anything like before. I'll take this one to bed with me, I think..

Night all.

Comments

[drainboy.livejournal.com]

I know so few languages that I really don't know what is good or unique about C++.

So no other languages have objects that can say "this data and function, we will have on a per object basis, whereas this data and function we will all share as one"?

[andrewducker]

Not that I've encountered. Doesn't mean they don't exist, of course.

Whenever I've wanted to do that in other languages I've had application level objects that all the other objects call. These tend to keep track of all the various counters that apply to lots of different places.

[drainboy.livejournal.com]

I guess it's just good that such a useful feature is explicit in the language.