andrewducker: (Default)
[personal profile] andrewducker

Date: 2012-06-15 11:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fjm.livejournal.com
Fascinating how the article on mothers of gay men decides attraction to men is the issue. I always assumed it was a survival characteristic in another way--uncles to provide extra support. There is evidence of this in that children with childless aunts and uncles tend to benefit from extra investment (lots of migrant studies on the different familial patterns of ethnic groups bears this out).

I have a cousin with six children by the way, and yes, her brother is gay (as is one of her sons).

Date: 2012-06-15 11:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hano.livejournal.com
Re Valve's economist, CCP hired an economics professor some years ago, up till then they had know real understanding as to why Eve's in game markets were behaving the way they did. Shame in a way, a lot of the easier ways of making in game cash got nerfed as a result.

Date: 2012-06-15 11:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hano.livejournal.com
that's a good discussion. Especially the stuff about the (eventual) economic integration of Dust 514, which as you can imagine, is being thought about a lot in my Alliance and I'm sure everywhere else. It'll be awesome if they can pull it off, but the apparent insistance on a PS3 only release can only hurt them. I say apparent, cos there's all sorts of hints and rumours about a roll out to PC and Xbox, but nothing concrete yet because of Sony and various exclusivity clauses in CCP's contract with them.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] hano.livejournal.com - Date: 2012-06-15 12:04 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2012-06-15 11:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hano.livejournal.com
I really wouldn't want to be one of Argyll & Bute's PR people right now. Or is it one of those councils that fired all their PR people to save money? Seeing as this is now a lead story on the BBC website, someone somewhere is looking ver stupid indeed. They really need to have the Striesland effect explained to them don't they?

Date: 2012-06-15 12:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] a-pawson.livejournal.com
I'm still mystified about why they took any action. I've just skim-read the blog and it's not as though it is constantly critical - many of the posts are complimentary about the food.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] iainjcoleman.livejournal.com - Date: 2012-06-15 03:07 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] snarlish.livejournal.com - Date: 2012-06-15 07:30 pm (UTC) - Expand
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
Oh, they quit because they want FEWER gay clergy, that's a disappointment.

Do you know anything about the church of scotland's decisions? That says they do have gay clergy, but only those previously ordained, but I couldn'd see why they'd ended up with that compromise.

Date: 2012-06-15 12:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
I've some sympathy for the council -- if I'd been been trying my best and suddenly everyone hated me, I can very much imagine lashing out: some things are genuinely harder to do under worldwide scrutiny.

But also, shouldn't children have freedom of speech? I mean, the school has to curtail SOME freedoms for their own safety, but isn't more transparancy and awareness about schools something we WANT, and this girl was succeeding where lots of prior effort hadn't, that's a GOOD thing.

Date: 2012-06-15 12:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steer.livejournal.com
I still don't get that "cabbage price" article:

"Transport generally makes up 13% of our costs," -- Um... OK, so the $28 cabbage would be $24.78 if it could teleport into the shop. That's still a pricey cabbage.

Date: 2012-06-15 01:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] naath.livejournal.com
They list other factors, including:
*higher shop-running costs (more expensive to light, heat, etc. the shop)
*higher minimum wage (more expensive to hire staff)
*higher spoilage rates (so you need to send more cabbages per cabbage you get to sell)

Date: 2012-06-15 01:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steer.livejournal.com
They did -- but it seemed hard to make the numbers add up -- the minimum wage wasn't double the minimum wage, the spoilage rates would only add on a percentage (unless a huge percent were spoiled)... the shop running costs, well I had no baseline figures to compare, but they didn't seem huge to me.

Date: 2012-06-15 12:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steer.livejournal.com
Have you read either FTW or Halting State? Both feature in-game economics as major plot points.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] steer.livejournal.com - Date: 2012-06-15 01:06 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] steer.livejournal.com - Date: 2012-06-15 01:20 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] steer.livejournal.com - Date: 2012-06-15 01:48 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] steer.livejournal.com - Date: 2012-06-18 04:48 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2012-06-15 01:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] drdoug.livejournal.com
Likewise Neal Stephenson's recent doorstopper novel REAMDE - the in-game economics are discussed at length in his inimitable style.

Date: 2012-06-15 01:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bart-calendar.livejournal.com
Couldn't it also just be that if 12 percent of men are going to be gay no matter what, that women who have more children are more likely to have gay sons?

I mean if there is a general 1 in 9 chance of a child being gay, the odds of you having a gay child increase if you have 5 kids rather than one.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] bart-calendar.livejournal.com - Date: 2012-06-15 01:17 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] moussaka-thief.livejournal.com - Date: 2012-06-15 02:16 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2012-06-15 02:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
Good question. The report sounded like they had slightly more detail than that, but not enough to explain what they DID measure. So I doubt it, although it wouldn't be the first time someone has mistaken a simple statistical mistake for a scientific observation.

Date: 2012-06-15 03:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] despotliz.livejournal.com
Here's the paper:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02785.x/full

which I haven't been through in detail, but I think this paragraph suggests they've controlled for that by getting matched controls:
"It is relevant to note that estimates referring to populations of units different from the survey units (i.e., in this case, the population of the mothers or aunts of homosexual subjects) is a complex issue and can lead to oversampling in large families (with higher fecundity than average). There is a tendency to oversample larger families due to their higher probability of being selected compared with smaller families. This tendency makes comparison with national statistics on family size inappropriate [...] The control sample was not from national statistics but instead was selected using the same methodology to reproduce the same possible biases and to guarantee the required internal validity of the comparisons."

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] bart-calendar.livejournal.com - Date: 2012-06-15 04:38 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2012-06-15 01:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bart-calendar.livejournal.com
Stoya is awesome, but she missed one other difference between prostitution and porn.

In prostitution the goal is to get the male partner off - generally as quickly as possible.

In porn the idea is to not get the dude off. Any given sex scene has to be filmed from multiple angles and it often takes eight hours of filming to get one 20 minute scene shot.

So, the couple fucks for three minutes. Then stops, has their make up adjusted, starts fucking again for another 15 minutes, then stops so the crew can change lights and camera angles, they fucks again for another 20 minutes.

If at any point in this process the male actor cums, they are fucked because of the time needed for a dude to get a second erection, plus if he accidentally shoots inside her they then have to get her douched so that people can't see jizz leaking out before there would be any logical reason to.

So, I guess what I'm saying is that a prostitute has to be as sexy as possible for her partner. A porn star, not so much.

(Did you know that often when you see a guy cum in a porn movie you aren't actually seeing a guy cum? You are seeing a penis shaped water pistol filled with Ivory soap shooting Ivory soap on the girl's tits, ass, face, whatever...)

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] bart-calendar.livejournal.com - Date: 2012-06-15 01:45 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2012-06-15 01:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steer.livejournal.com
Any given sex scene has to be filmed from multiple angles and it often takes eight hours of filming to get one 20 minute scene shot.

Really -- this is sort of surprising as I guessed they would want to cut costs as much as possible so such a long period filming to film in the can ratio seems super duper high production values. I wonder why?

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] bart-calendar.livejournal.com - Date: 2012-06-15 02:11 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] steer.livejournal.com - Date: 2012-06-15 02:41 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] bart-calendar.livejournal.com - Date: 2012-06-15 03:05 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] channelpenguin.livejournal.com - Date: 2012-06-15 02:48 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] bart-calendar.livejournal.com - Date: 2012-06-15 03:07 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] drdoug.livejournal.com - Date: 2012-06-15 07:50 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] khbrown.livejournal.com - Date: 2012-06-15 04:22 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] steer.livejournal.com - Date: 2012-06-18 04:47 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2012-06-15 02:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] spacelem.livejournal.com
I really like Stoya too. I have to say I did not realise that shoots took that long -- I just figured you got the multiple angles from having multiple people with cameras.

I haven't seen many water pistols that haven't been obvious, but I guess it would make sense since there's generally a lot more liquid than you'd expect.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] bart-calendar.livejournal.com - Date: 2012-06-15 02:32 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] bart-calendar.livejournal.com - Date: 2012-06-15 02:34 pm (UTC) - Expand

March 2026

S M T W T F S
1 2 34567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 3rd, 2026 08:40 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios