Interesting Links for 13-06-2012
Jun. 13th, 2012 12:00 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
- If you fire a missle containing GPL'd code at someone, do you have to make the source available too?
- Smart sensors are being trialled all over Glasgow to allow querying of city status. Definitely future-tech time.
- Falkland Islands to hold referendum on sovereignty
- Very nice visualisation of basketball scoring broken down by location.
- Rejection by either parent can cause insecurity throughout life (Some people always blame the mothers. Idiots)
- The only honest revenue based sites out there are porn.
- Men Probably Too Hormonal and Moody to be Trusted with Important Financial Decisions
- Melting Arctic blooms with algae
- Cultural Imperialism, now with bingo!
- The game of Civilization II that's been going on for almost 10 years.
- Amusing Ourselves To Death: Brave New World vs 1984
- Game of Thrones Director Explains All the Rampant Nudity
- Prometheus in Fifteen Minutes
- What effects do the incredibly successful projects have on Kickstarter?
- Dear The Internet, This Is Why You Can't Have Anything Nice
- Great example of how fake real life "documentaries" can be.
no subject
Date: 2012-06-13 11:15 am (UTC)Sexual harassment in the world of video gaming
World Service "Assignment" podcast
Related BBC News article
no subject
Date: 2012-06-13 11:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-13 12:57 pm (UTC)Smart sensors are being trialled all over Glasgow to allow querying of city status.
Date: 2012-06-13 11:33 am (UTC)Although now I'm mildly reminded of a Niven or Asimov story about early teleport booths, where one of the side effects was that whenever there was a crowd, people would flash in from all over the world to join in.
Re: Smart sensors are being trialled all over Glasgow to allow querying of city status.
Date: 2012-06-13 02:01 pm (UTC)Re: Smart sensors are being trialled all over Glasgow to allow querying of city status.
Date: 2012-06-13 02:04 pm (UTC)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flash_Crowd
no subject
Date: 2012-06-13 12:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-13 12:07 pm (UTC)The question is whether "Firing a missile at someone" is the same as "handing someone a computer".
no subject
Date: 2012-06-13 12:44 pm (UTC)computermissile to boot up, or at least be able to access the software after delivery then I would say yes.no subject
Date: 2012-06-13 01:47 pm (UTC)If I hit someone over the head with my windows/linux computer, does that count as distributing it to them?
I think the US are definitely not GIVING the targets the missile, I think they want to retain ownership. They're at best giving them a one-time use of one specific function of it.
I agree the GPL could say this, maybe, but I didn't find it obvious that it did.
no subject
Date: 2012-06-13 02:07 pm (UTC)"To 'convey' a work means any kind of propagation that enables other parties to make or receive copies. Mere interaction with a user through a computer network, with no transfer of a copy, is not conveying."
http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html
no subject
Date: 2012-06-13 02:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-13 02:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-13 12:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-13 12:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-13 12:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-13 12:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-13 12:57 pm (UTC)From which we shall create The Singularity!
no subject
Date: 2012-06-13 01:12 pm (UTC)Or you can just accidentally trip over the power cable.
no subject
Date: 2012-06-13 01:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-14 10:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-13 12:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-13 06:17 pm (UTC)Aha, I think I've just worked out the answer to this. If you maintain that firing a missile at somebody containing executable code constitutes distribution (for GPL purposes) of that executable code and thus incurs an obligation on the firer to provide the target with a copy of the source, then surely you must also accept that the same distribution method is also a legitimate way to convey that copy of the source code.
So if anyone sues me for the source after I fire the first missile at them, I stick the source code somewhere inside missile #2, and just incidentally try to aim it a bit better than I did #1.
(Bonus: per GPLv2 clause 3(b) or GPLv3 6(b), I can charge them my delivery cost. So I not only get to shoot them with missile #2, but they have to pay me for it as well!)
no subject
Date: 2012-06-14 08:52 am (UTC)Or I guess you could just wait to be sued by the free software people and rebut (a) I have missiles and (b) everyone who I shot the missiles at is dead, so there aren't any damages be awarded since they wouldn't have got any benefit from the source code :)
no subject
Date: 2012-06-14 10:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-14 08:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-15 09:39 am (UTC)