Date: 2011-07-06 09:21 pm (UTC)
teresafloyd: (Default)
From: [personal profile] teresafloyd
I'm glad at least some of the books inside those awful covers aren't too bad. I own quite a few of them!

Date: 2011-07-06 11:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kerrypolka.livejournal.com
Mmmmmm tasty, tasty salt.

Date: 2011-07-06 11:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] channelpenguin.livejournal.com
I eat a lot of salt once more. Seems to help stop be being stiff. Blood pressure is perfect at all tests (anywhere from 116/66 to 120/80), resting heart rate about 62. I don't watch my fat intake and I don't do 'cardio' either! Don't regularly eat many carbs [barring intermittent binges])

I don't think I'm just geneiocally 'lucky' - when I drank, and ate more 'normally', my blood pressure was horrible (142/92) and my heart rate 70-90.

Date: 2011-07-06 11:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] channelpenguin.livejournal.com
On the dreadful book covers - I see from "Status Quotient: The Carrier" on page 4 that proto-UGG boots were/will be trendy in the past/future...

Actually, that guy is quite hunky... I won't hold the Uggs against him - now I'm thinking what's so wrong with this cover ? :-)

Date: 2011-07-06 11:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] star-tourmaline.livejournal.com
I'm afraid I don't think anything reduces your chances of dying.

Date: 2011-07-06 11:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bart-calendar.livejournal.com
I'm not sure a lot of those covers are fair to include in a worst sci-fi/fantasy covers list. Many of them are not sci-fi but simply works of genres that couldn't be marketed as what they were at the time (erotica, fetish fiction, white power fiction) and had to have a cover that pretended the book was sci-fi while also letting readers know what it was.

I mean, of course, a vintage Gor book is going to have an insane cover - but that doesn't make it a sci-fi or fantasy book, it's still porn for DomBoys and PetGirls.

Other covers - the Phillip K. Dick one for example - simply represent the artistic design trend of their time.

Date: 2011-07-06 11:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] strawberryfrog.livejournal.com
I could eat less salt if it didn't mean eating less Marmite.

Date: 2011-07-06 11:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] strawberryfrog.livejournal.com
I tried to connect my personal Android device (a Google/Samsung Nexus S) to work's email, which is on a MS exchange server. In order to set up the connection, I had to grant them permission to remotely wipe the device, i.e. ability to erase all my data and apps by checking a box on the server.

Never mind that they don't want and won't use this ability; I refused on principle since it's just too disproportionate - nuke permissions just so I can send and receive bits of text? Forget it.

So, no enterpriseyness for me on android since that case was just not thought through. After all, people connecting their own phones to work's email is very uncommon, right? /endsarcasm
Edited Date: 2011-07-06 11:48 am (UTC)

Date: 2011-07-06 12:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cairmen.livejournal.com
Wow, that LA Noire game made me angry - particularly since a lot of the bollocks the head man talked about "well, it's new technology, this just happens" also applies to the work I do. What total crap.

Date: 2011-07-06 12:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] momentsmusicaux.livejournal.com
Because it took them that long to put the superfluous 'e' in?

Date: 2011-07-06 12:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] strawberryfrog.livejournal.com
Why not? Erase their own confidential data maybe, but everything else as well is taking it too far.

Date: 2011-07-06 12:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] supergee.livejournal.com
The cover guy just doesn't like monsters. And what can you do a book called The Color of Her Panties to make it worse?

Date: 2011-07-06 12:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nancylebov.livejournal.com
I'd say that if it takes place on a planet on the other side of the sun from earth and has an ongoing invented culture, it's sf. It's not good sf, it might even be evil sf because of the generalization to all men and all women, but I don't think we only get to claim the relatively good stuff.

Date: 2011-07-06 12:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] strawberryfrog.livejournal.com
Hm, I see.

The sensible compromise may be to allow a remote wipe of an app and all its data. not the whole phone. I can see how you want the OS to do this, not the app itself, which might not be running before app the data is siphoned out.

However saving attachments out of the email app into general storage is not a new security hole, nor is it specific to phones. Ctrl-C, Ctrl-V gets around a lot of security.

Date: 2011-07-06 12:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] strawberryfrog.livejournal.com
I just tried to verify on Google that the title was a spoof of Piers Anthony's style and preoccupations.

I found out that it was not a spoof. :(

Date: 2011-07-06 12:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] henriksdal.livejournal.com
haha - I thought the Scifi covers were shopped until I recognised the Puffin Citadel of Chaos book :>

Date: 2011-07-06 01:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anton-p-nym.livejournal.com
I have a similar arrangement at my office, and the privacy concerns are enormous... because we handle health data now, so PHIPPA (Personal Health Information Privacy Protection Act, read as "pee-hippa" by most, read as "bane of my existance" by me) absolutely forbids a lot of forms of data-sharing most companies use routinely. To the point of insane restrictions on how "ctrl-c" and "ctrl-v" work... we lean on Citrix pretty heavily to comply.

-- Steve isn't quite so quick as others to blame corruption and incompetance for the mess that resulted from Ontario's attempt to move patient charts online... PHIPPA was *not* written with the Internet in mind, and forbidding the use of IP (and related infrastructure) because the packets might venture out-of-province absolutely cripples the enterprise from the get-go.

Date: 2011-07-06 01:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anton-p-nym.livejournal.com
If I understand the mess correctly (IANAL) the phrasing of the law is archaic and badly needs changing; it doesn't distinguish between data and packets when it forbids allowing health information to leave the province.

IP packet switching doesn't distinguish by geography. So in order to use IP, eHealth would have had to lay down its own network without access out-of-province. And laying down a dedicated, separate network (particularly to rural and remote regions) is prohibitively expensive.

Soooo, billion-dollar boondoggle that gets nowhere because government can't seem to ammend PHIPPA while trying to both conform to it and to allow doctors to use the existing Internet.

-- Steve calls it the bane of his existance for a reason.

Date: 2011-07-06 02:15 pm (UTC)
simont: A picture of me in 2016 (Default)
From: [personal profile] simont
Publish it :-)

Date: 2011-07-06 02:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steer.livejournal.com
Cutting down on salt doesn't reduce your chance of dying

Unless you're a slug.

Date: 2011-07-06 02:45 pm (UTC)
mair_in_grenderich: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mair_in_grenderich
that was my thought :)

Date: 2011-07-06 03:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
The reasons why Exchange ActiveSync works that way are covered below - but why don't you connect via IMAP instead? Exchange servers speak IMAP even if you won't get the GAL connection and will need to sync that separately.

Date: 2011-07-06 04:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] strawberryfrog.livejournal.com
I have just tried that suggestion - in theory yes, IMAP is on, in practice ... the port is fire-walled when connecting from my phone.

I can live without mobile work email.

Date: 2011-07-06 06:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] drdoug.livejournal.com
Nah, it's like in TFA - it was only a moderate reduction in salt. I would imagine that going from, say, 10g/day salt to 8g/day isn't going to materially affect slug mortality either.

Date: 2011-07-08 09:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] doubtingmichael.livejournal.com
My experience was usually the opposite - you got some SF book with a racy looking cover, and then the contents were much tamer. Of course, I was looking for SF/fantasy, not porn.

I think the publishers liked to have salacious covers to draw people's attention on the shelves, and maybe to draw in people who were after some porn. But it often wasn't truth in advertising.

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
45 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 1415 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 1st, 2026 07:56 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios