Page Summary
dpolicar - (no subject)
pigwotflies.livejournal.com - (no subject)
andrewducker - (no subject)
ipslore.livejournal.com - (no subject)
dreema.livejournal.com - (no subject)
momentsmusicaux.livejournal.com - (no subject)
alitheapipkin.livejournal.com - (no subject)
a-pawson.livejournal.com - (no subject)
garunya.livejournal.com - (no subject)
dougs.livejournal.com - (no subject)
drswirly.livejournal.com - (no subject)
random-redhead.livejournal.com - (no subject)
greybeta.livejournal.com - (no subject)
nmg.livejournal.com - (no subject)
nmg.livejournal.com - (no subject)
drjon.livejournal.com - (no subject)
vereybowring.livejournal.com - (no subject)
buddleia.livejournal.com - (no subject)
drdoug.livejournal.com - (no subject)
buddleia.livejournal.com - (no subject)
stillcarl.livejournal.com - (no subject)
andrewducker - (no subject)
stillcarl.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Active Entries
- 1: Interesting Links for 10-04-2026
- 2: Interesting Links for 12-04-2026
- 3: Photo cross-post
- 4: Interesting Links for 08-04-2026
- 5: Interesting Links for 09-04-2026
- 6: Photo cross-post
- 7: Life with two kids: magic numbers
- 8: Interesting Links for 31-03-2026
- 9: What books did Terry Pratchett find inspirational?
- 10: Interesting Links for 03-04-2026
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2011-01-11 05:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-11 05:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-11 05:37 pm (UTC)http://miltontan.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/duck-rabbit_illusion.jpg?w=300&h=202
And some more:
http://www.avclub.com/articles/rabbit-or-duck,38021/
no subject
Date: 2011-01-11 05:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-11 05:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-11 05:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-11 06:02 pm (UTC)Is that more or less pedantic than asking you to define what you mean by better in this context? ;)
no subject
Date: 2011-01-11 06:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-11 06:09 pm (UTC)In terms of food, however, duck is one of my favourites, so it's the clear winner here.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-11 06:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-11 06:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-11 06:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-11 06:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-11 08:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-11 08:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-11 09:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-12 12:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-12 09:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-12 11:57 am (UTC)(No, really - in modern taxonomy, birds are regarded as the surviving part of the Dinosauria superorder, and what we think of as dinosaurs are 'non-avian dinosaurs'.)
Ducks might look all waddly and benign but really they are hyper-evolved Velociraptors. The dim quacking business is to lure us all in to a false sense of security.
So yeah, as you point out, way more awesome than rabbits. Or terrifying, come to that. Mind you, rabbits do a similar 'look unthreatening then go for you' trick, as revealed in at least two serious attacks on important figures of authority:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rabbit_of_Caerbannog
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Carter_rabbit_incident
no subject
Date: 2011-01-12 12:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-13 07:23 am (UTC)http://photopath.livejournal.com/
no subject
Date: 2011-01-13 08:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-13 08:51 am (UTC)