GAH!

[andrewducker]

The BBC now has a "Best arguments for voting Yes or No" on AV page up.

And while I'm annoyed that the No campaign are still arguing that AV means
that some votes are counted more than others (clearly untrue - every round
counts all votes for people whose preferences are still in the running), I
am _furious_ at the awful arguments put forward by the Yes campaign.

The bit which seems to actually grab people (an end to the split vote
problem, where you can have 70% of people voting for an X-wing party, and a
Y-wing party gets the seat) is relegated to an aside in point 4, which 90%
of people will never see.

I am incredibly frustrated by their continued incompetence at getting their
message across.

Am I wrong? Do people really think that AV will make MPs work harder? Does
anyone really care about that? Is there any reason whatsoever for that to
be the top point?

Comments

[strange-complex.livejournal.com]

Thankfully, it looks like the official Yes campaign may at last be getting one thing right. Their second referendum broadcast has just appeared, and it's a re-filmed version of Dan Snow's coffee or pub video. Pity they didn't focus on the point it makes from the start (as you say). But let's hope too late isn't too little in this case.

[andrewducker]

Yeah, saw that on LDV.

And, of course, that video is the source of the fantastic leaflet I had on my journal the other day.

I just hope it gets out to enough people. I'll take a look at it when I get home (no video at work).