Page Summary
Active Entries
- 1: Interesting Links for 28-09-2025
- 2: Interesting Links for 26-09-2025
- 3: A thing I don't understand about people
- 4: Interesting Links for 18-09-2025
- 5: Oddly recurrent stomach issues
- 6: Whining about online t-shirt purchases.
- 7: Interesting Links for 25-09-2025
- 8: Interesting Links for 23-09-2025
- 9: Interesting Links for 24-09-2025
- 10: Photo cross-post
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2011-01-30 11:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-30 11:37 am (UTC)And what the article proposes as a "solution" is essentially keeping women pregnant all the time, because it's "natural" that way. Do you agree with that?
It also doesn't mention that the reason said eternally-pregnant African women don't die of cancer is because they don't live long enough to get it!
no subject
Date: 2011-01-30 11:53 am (UTC)What? I don't see the article talking about fault anywhere. Nobody is being blamed for anything. I can't see where it says anywhere that being on the pill causes cancer - it's talking about how high numbers of periods are associated with it, which happens with absolutely any kind of birth control that doesn't prevent them entirely.
And what the article proposes as a "solution" is essentially keeping women pregnant all the time, because it's "natural" that way.
Again, not what I read. "A truly natural Pill might be one that found a way to suppress ovulation without using progestin." and "Pike's proposed solution is a class of drugs known as GnRHAs, which has been around for many years." indicated to me that what they want is a pill that suppresses ovulation entirely, without the use of progestin.
It also doesn't mention that the reason said eternally-pregnant African women don't die of cancer is because they don't live long enough to get it!
From the article "Those who survive early childhood typically live into their seventh or eighth decade"