My square eyes are now widescreen
Dec. 14th, 2010 12:13 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
[Poll #1656749]
A quick definition for the non-technology-minded:
If you're watching it on iPlayer or via any website, or via Video On Demand, then you're streaming. If you download a file to your computer to watch whenever you feel like it then you're downloading.
Oh, and VHS tapes, for the purposes of this poll, count as shiny disks. You are also banished back to the Second Millenium.
A quick definition for the non-technology-minded:
If you're watching it on iPlayer or via any website, or via Video On Demand, then you're streaming. If you download a file to your computer to watch whenever you feel like it then you're downloading.
Oh, and VHS tapes, for the purposes of this poll, count as shiny disks. You are also banished back to the Second Millenium.
no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 12:33 pm (UTC)Though allowing us to watch everything all the time would not be constricted enough to make people do things like buy the media we could perma-stream. So I imagine that you'll never be able to watch "anything". I guess you might end up having channels which are "what's on" in the same way as we have now, but with no denotion of when it's on. Although with new media, when it's on becomes "when it's released", as I can still see a lot of people wanting to gather around the box (which becomes increasingly misnomered given my current screen has a width to depth ratio of 40:1 and that will get even more ridiculous with OLED and, eventually, QLED) to watch the latest new thing as soon as it comes out.
no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 12:48 pm (UTC)But, even with "everything" to watch, people are self-limiting. Me and Julie are 1/3 of the way through season three of Chuck, and in the middle of season four of How I Met Your Mother, and we're happily following those. Once we've finished them we'll find something else to watch instead.
no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 03:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 12:50 pm (UTC)True - this is a well-known thing - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Paradox_of_Choice:_Why_More_Is_Less . I like it myself - it gives me more opportunity *not* to do things.
I'll explain. When I moved to Manchester to go to university, from a very small town, suddenly there were a lot more opportunities to *do* things. If someone who did one single I'd quite liked once had ever played the town where I grew up, I'd have been excited about it for weeks beforehand, but now I could go out pretty much every night and see someone whose music I'd bought. So I only went to those gigs I *really* wanted to go to. The same with music. As a teenager, growing up with scarce music, I would buy *every* record I might conceivably ever want to listen to, because I wouldn't know if I'd ever see it again and I couldn't pick and choose anyway - hence I have dozens of charity-shop Johnny Cash albums and so on.
Whereas now, I know that should I ever want to listen to Johnny Cash singing Christmas songs, I can hear it with two clicks, so I save my money and time for the things I actually care about, or the few things that are still scarce (things that are too unpopular to torrent, generally).
no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 03:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 01:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 01:04 pm (UTC)Also: I need coasters.