Well, yes.

Oct. 14th, 2010 10:50 pm
andrewducker: (Default)
[personal profile] andrewducker
The can of insect killing spray has a warning on it that "Solvent abuse can kill."

Leaving aside that I'm not sure that Raid is a solvent, who tries to get high using something designed to kill????

Date: 2010-10-14 10:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] iainjcoleman.livejournal.com
I assume from your question that you've never spent much time in Lanarkshire.

Date: 2010-10-14 10:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gonzo21.livejournal.com
Personally I feel that cans of insect killing spray should probably include a big banner ad saying 'Caution, you can get REALLY REALLY HIGH OFF THIS!'

And then we can let Darwin take care of raising the average level of intelligence of the population.

Date: 2010-10-14 10:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] a-pawson.livejournal.com
Raid is water-based, it contains almost nothing that would be classed as a solvent from a chemist's point of view. But the propellant gases are most likely a combination of butane/propane/iso-propane, which whilst would not be considered solvents in a chemistry sense, are classed as solvents in terms of drug abuse.

Date: 2010-10-14 11:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anton-p-nym.livejournal.com
who tries to get high using something designed to kill?

Pretty much everyone trying to get high, for certain values of "designed". Just this morning I pointed out to someone that caffeine and nicotine were naturally-evolved pesticides... and the ingredients list for a lot of drugs makes them look even more toxic than they end up to be.

-- Steve thinks that huffing Raid is a pretty stupid idea, even for those who think huffing paint is okay.

Date: 2010-10-14 11:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skington.livejournal.com
Like this guy?



(I just wanted to re-post it.)

Date: 2010-10-14 11:18 pm (UTC)
matgb: Artwork of 19th century upper class anarchist, text: MatGB (Default)
From: [personal profile] matgb
Hopefully, no one, but "thou shalt put this warning on solvents" is the regulation. Not "thou shalt put this warning on solvents except for daft ones" as companies would try to wriggle out of it.

Date: 2010-10-15 12:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
And that is probably the right decision; even if it produces incongruous results, cutting exceptions, while natural, is likely to lead to complications. At best, they could consider some alternative wording that might seem less incongruous if people wanted.

Date: 2010-10-15 02:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oldbaldchris.livejournal.com
"who tries to get high using something designed to kill"

You're not serious are you Andy? Where were you living the last 20 years?

April 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 2223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 23rd, 2025 10:30 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios