Date: 2010-06-20 01:16 pm (UTC)
ext_58972: Mad! (Default)
From: [identity profile] autopope.livejournal.com
The "future of medicine" commencement speech is dangerously misleading from a British viewpoint -- a lot of what he's describing are side-effects of the American system of commercial medicine. (That's not to say we don't have problems over here, but the ramping of costs is largely a side-effect of the way healthcare is delivered over there. Lots of spurious and very expensive diagnostic tests to pad the bills), a grotesque lack of attention to preventitive medicine, and devil take the [uninsured] hindmost.

Date: 2010-06-21 03:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] drdoug.livejournal.com
There is a huge shift to what's called 'protocol-based care' and 'guideline-based care', across the sector internationally. The drivers in different health systems are different (and the UK and the US perhaps illustrate extremes of insurer-led drivers and the UK government-led drivers), but there are broad similarities.

The idea is that a group of suitably-qualified people develop a protocol or guideline for a particular situation, based on the best available evidence, which usually also includes some measures of cost/benefit analysis (often by proxy). Then health workers simply follow those instructions, unless they have a good reason for departing from the usual process, which they are typically obliged to account for.

There are all sorts of problems with it, but as a tool for deploying very focused intelligence across a huge range of people it's not bad, IMO.

Date: 2010-06-21 03:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] drdoug.livejournal.com
It's also flat wrong in places - e.g. "There is no industry in the world with 13,600 different service lines to deliver." My guess is that most industries in the world have more than that, unless you have a very narrow definition of what constitutes a single industry and a very broad one of what constitutes a single service line. Certainly narrower than 'medicine' and broader than 'distinct code in ICD-10, disregarding subclassifications'.

Although I suppose if he meant 'with precisely 13,600 - no more, no less' it's almost certainly true.

September 2025

S M T W T F S
  12 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 28th, 2025 08:58 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios