Feb. 20th, 2006
In the interests of avoiding hypocrisy
Feb. 20th, 2006 10:52 pmI'd like to make it clear that I'm totally, utterly 100% against the jailing David Irving for denying The Holocaust..
This is for two reasons.
One of them is less important - he recanted fifteen years ago.
The other is summed up by the person he unsuccessfully sued for libel "I am not happy when censorship wins, and I don't believe in winning battles via censorship... The way of fighting Holocaust deniers is with history and with truth."
Locking people up for expressing an opinion is something I find totally repellent, _no matter what that opinion might be_. Unless the person is actively inciting others to commit harmful acts, I believe they should have freedom to express themselves as they wish.
This is for two reasons.
One of them is less important - he recanted fifteen years ago.
The other is summed up by the person he unsuccessfully sued for libel "I am not happy when censorship wins, and I don't believe in winning battles via censorship... The way of fighting Holocaust deniers is with history and with truth."
Locking people up for expressing an opinion is something I find totally repellent, _no matter what that opinion might be_. Unless the person is actively inciting others to commit harmful acts, I believe they should have freedom to express themselves as they wish.