![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
andrewducker
Notice the trend up throughout the 90s as things got worse and worse, and then the trend down shortly after Labour took office?
They may have done a lot of things wrong, but the NHS is a lot better off than it was.
From
andrewduckerNotice the trend up throughout the 90s as things got worse and worse, and then the trend down shortly after Labour took office?
They may have done a lot of things wrong, but the NHS is a lot better off than it was.
From
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2010-02-01 05:45 pm (UTC)They also publish a separate set of life tables.
Life expectancy at birth and at age 65 consistently increased over the last few decades, but the increases are larger in 1997/99 - 2006/08 than in 1988/90 - 1997/99, for both men and woman and for both ages. The "extra" improvement is between 25% and 95% over the 1988/90 - 1997/99 baseline.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-01 08:10 pm (UTC)Total tangent (always happens to me when I get my head stuck in to these sorts of figures) but I'm interested to note (from an accompanying PDF) that the life expectancy gap between males and females has shrunk from 5.4 years in 1991/93 to 4.2 years in 2006/08 - because male life expectancy improved even more than female.
Hooray for improved life expectancy. It's a good thing to have come to expect.