Page Summary
Active Entries
- 1: Life with two children: Gideon updates
- 2: Photo cross-post
- 3: Interesting Links for 14-03-2026
- 4: Interesting Links for 13-03-2026
- 5: I need to know when it's okay to tell your partner you love them
- 6: Interesting Links for 11-03-2026
- 7: Interesting Links for 12-03-2026
- 8: Interesting Links for 10-03-2026
- 9: Links Extra: More data than you ever wanted.
- 10: Interesting Links for 09-03-2026
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2010-01-05 11:25 am (UTC)Back recursion is good for computers, but silly for humans. Start the other way round and use induction: two people are siblings; their children are cousins; their grandchildren are 2nd cousins, etc.
The problem with removal is that it's symmetric, which is silly, because we have a different word for nephew/uncle.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-05 11:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-05 12:03 pm (UTC)My explanation would be similar, and for mathematicians definitely use the 0'th cousins terminology, but to try to be clearer, be something like:
* If Joe and Sally are siblings, their children are first cousins
* if Joe and Sally are n'th cousins, their children are n+1'th cousins
* if Joe the First and Sally are n'th cousins, Joe The N+1 and Sally are first cousins N times removed.
I used to find it very confusing before anyone explained it to me, which took a long time, but it didn't seem especially complicated once someone HAD explained it.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-05 12:43 pm (UTC)(It therefore seemed particularly silly to me that the explicitly worked example on that page was one in which M=N.)
no subject
Date: 2010-01-05 12:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-05 12:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-05 11:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-05 01:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-05 01:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-05 02:12 pm (UTC)*raspberry*
A a person who is part Jewish this INFURIATES me.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-05 02:37 pm (UTC)