Page Summary
Active Entries
- 1: Interesting Links for 30-09-2025
- 2: Interesting Links for 28-09-2025
- 3: It's very educational being me
- 4: Interesting Links for 26-09-2025
- 5: A thing I don't understand about people
- 6: Interesting Links for 18-09-2025
- 7: Oddly recurrent stomach issues
- 8: Whining about online t-shirt purchases.
- 9: Interesting Links for 25-09-2025
- 10: Interesting Links for 23-09-2025
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2010-01-05 11:25 am (UTC)Back recursion is good for computers, but silly for humans. Start the other way round and use induction: two people are siblings; their children are cousins; their grandchildren are 2nd cousins, etc.
The problem with removal is that it's symmetric, which is silly, because we have a different word for nephew/uncle.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-05 11:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-05 12:03 pm (UTC)My explanation would be similar, and for mathematicians definitely use the 0'th cousins terminology, but to try to be clearer, be something like:
* If Joe and Sally are siblings, their children are first cousins
* if Joe and Sally are n'th cousins, their children are n+1'th cousins
* if Joe the First and Sally are n'th cousins, Joe The N+1 and Sally are first cousins N times removed.
I used to find it very confusing before anyone explained it to me, which took a long time, but it didn't seem especially complicated once someone HAD explained it.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-05 12:43 pm (UTC)(It therefore seemed particularly silly to me that the explicitly worked example on that page was one in which M=N.)
no subject
Date: 2010-01-05 12:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-05 12:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-05 11:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-05 01:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-05 01:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-05 02:12 pm (UTC)*raspberry*
A a person who is part Jewish this INFURIATES me.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-05 02:37 pm (UTC)