The Grim Professional Future
Oct. 14th, 2009 12:17 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I was at a party a few years ago where the people split into two groups - the ones who were happily singing around a piano and the ones who were hiding in the kitchen, aghast that people would sing, in public, for fun. The split was clearly generational in nature - the older folks had clearly grown up singing together, the younger ones considered singing to be something that was done by musicians.
And despite theoretically belonging to the second group I've generally felt that this was a bad thing. My parents used to sing on long car journeys, entertaining us when we were little, and it always seemed like a lot of fun. I can trace the point where I lost any interest in it to my first choir lesson in school, where we all lined up in rows and sang through something vaguely religious - and then afterwards the choirmaster told me that I should just mime along. This would have been twenty six years ago, but the memory still sticks with me.
The idea that a pupil who wasn't good at something should be told to just _stop_ is something that shocks me in retrospect - it's a massive failure on the behalf of any teacher. And the idea that singing is something that should be done only by the trained - rather than a natural expression of our humanity is also something that bothers me deeply.
There does seem to have been a resurgence recently - things like YouTube and Singstar/Rock Band seem to have encouraged people to put their own voice out there in the same way that blogs encouraged people to write. But I doubt very much that we're going to end up back at the point where sing-songs around the piano are common place again.
Mind you - a lot of this is probably down to the fact that playing Grand Theft Auto is a more distracting and, dare I say it, fun way of spending the evening :->
All of this triggered by a quote here in an article on the long history of articles decrying technical progress in the "content industry" - starting with Sousa (the composer) worrying about the player piano and the gramophone:
And despite theoretically belonging to the second group I've generally felt that this was a bad thing. My parents used to sing on long car journeys, entertaining us when we were little, and it always seemed like a lot of fun. I can trace the point where I lost any interest in it to my first choir lesson in school, where we all lined up in rows and sang through something vaguely religious - and then afterwards the choirmaster told me that I should just mime along. This would have been twenty six years ago, but the memory still sticks with me.
The idea that a pupil who wasn't good at something should be told to just _stop_ is something that shocks me in retrospect - it's a massive failure on the behalf of any teacher. And the idea that singing is something that should be done only by the trained - rather than a natural expression of our humanity is also something that bothers me deeply.
There does seem to have been a resurgence recently - things like YouTube and Singstar/Rock Band seem to have encouraged people to put their own voice out there in the same way that blogs encouraged people to write. But I doubt very much that we're going to end up back at the point where sing-songs around the piano are common place again.
Mind you - a lot of this is probably down to the fact that playing Grand Theft Auto is a more distracting and, dare I say it, fun way of spending the evening :->
All of this triggered by a quote here in an article on the long history of articles decrying technical progress in the "content industry" - starting with Sousa (the composer) worrying about the player piano and the gramophone:
"Under such conditions, the tide of amateurism cannot but recede until there will be left only the mechanical device and the professional executant.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 11:24 am (UTC)Have you ever played Sing Star?
With a group of non judgmental friends it is great fun.
Better than GTA, but harder to organise on a tuesday evening when everyone has work the next day.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 11:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 11:38 am (UTC)On the other hand, amateurism does appear to be making a bit of a comeback, fuelled by YouTube and by the wondrous ability of the Internet as an instruction tool (I learnt to knit last year entirely off the internet, for example).
I play lots of video games (including rhythm games of course). But I also run a session (2nd Tuesday, Plough Inn, Walthamstow), and making music with other people, for no purpose but your own entertainment, is a fine, fine way to spend an evening.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 11:44 am (UTC)I have tried the SingStar/Rockband/GHIII singing and find it all just totally unenjoyable. It's *nothing* like real singing - a decent performance will often score very badly (and vice versa!). Only one of them (forget which) is tolerant of harmonising. I only really do well in the "freestyle" bits!
I listened to a little girl (about 10 or 11) play and whilst she scored well,what came out was pretty horrible to listen to due to the limited set of notes allowed by the level she was playing. She had a decent voice and I thought it sad that she wasn't just singing songs. I shudder to think what happens when all the people who score well in the games think that they can therefore sing and try it with a band (or a talent contest!).Ouch. Still, I can hope they can hear the difference and it inspires them to sing for real.
The guys at the last party I went to who were in bands seemed to have a similar attitude to the instrumental parts of such games.
Some folks put LOADS of effort and time into these games - almost as much as you'd need to practice a real instrument. I don't understand it but I guess the getting an actual *score* might be important. A rating that you can compare with your friends to settle the question of who is the best....
no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 11:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 12:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:part 1 of 2
Date: 2009-10-14 12:52 pm (UTC)And believe me when I say I'm plenty narrow-minded and elitist already.
It's true that you're limited slightly when you're singing in these games, because you need to hit each note in the correct pitch, and if you insert any character into the song - some artistic gravelly voice for example or a bit of glissando around the edges, you tend to lower your score. However, if you don't care about the score and are just playing for fun, you'll still pass the song as long as you've sung more or less correctly, particularly on the easy levels where you just have to hit the right note at some point along the way.
The Beatles Rock Band has the facility for three mics, allowing for (in some cases quite complicated) three-part harmony - you can even mix and match what you sing throughout the song as long as one of you's on the tune at any given point. I've done this with a mic on a stand in front of me while I played an instrument part at the same time, and I can tell you, it's both challenging and requiring of musical ability.
The big drawback of the singing part is that even at its highest levels what the game wants is for you to exactly reproduce the original artist's performance, not give your own take - but then, if you sing in a cover band, that's presumably an aspect of your own aim too?
The big bonus of the singing part is that, particularly at the highest levels, it will expect you to be perfectly on pitch (assuming the original performer was of course), and this cannot be entirely useless to the training singer or one who's wondering if they have any ability to hold a tune in a bucket.
When I personally sing in these games I'm not really going for a high score though, so I'll admit that I imagine listening to a points-getting performance might well be boring.
As to the other instruments, I play drums well enough to know that from the Hard level up, you are playing an actual drum beat. You could move from Hard on GH/RB to a real live kit and walk straight in and pass Standard Grade (age 16 exams) music performance at Credit level.
The guitar part is almost nothing like playing guitar. Even then, though, only almost - although the left hand fingering is nothing like hold chord shapes, the basic principle of how it works (hold down correct button/collection of buttons (as opposed to string/collection of strings), then strum to create note) is the same. The strumming is the same - to the extent that my strumming on a real guitar has actually improved. There is no doubt that your hand-eye coordination, and your ability to hear and understand cross-rhythms (even if most people don't know that's what they're hearing/playing) is improved by playing the game, even though you obviously couldn't then move straight to a real guitar.
Re: part 1 of 2
From:Re: part 1 of 2
From:Re: part 1 of 2
From:Re: part 1 of 2
From:Re: part 1 of 2
From:Re: part 1 of 2
From:Re: part 1 of 2
From:Re: part 1 of 2
From:part 2 of 2
Date: 2009-10-14 12:52 pm (UTC)Finally, look at it from the POV of why folk - any folk - play video games.
- I know people who enjoy playing beat-em-ups, presumably because a part of them likes picturing themselves as a fit, strong, fast fighter while they bash buttons in a specific order.
- I know people who enjoy playing FPS games - presumably a part of them likes to picture them as a hard-as-nails dude/chick with a gun/axe/chainsaw while they bash buttons in a specific order.
- I know people who enjoy racing games, picturing themselves in a sexy car while they... well, you get the picture - it's all just bashing buttons in the end.
In my case, while I bash buttons in a specific order, I like my buttons bashes not to kill sprites, knock them out, or win a race, but to produce music, and while I do it I can imagine myself rocking out on a stage.
The fact that I have the facility and opportunity to rock out on a stage for real from time to time (there's a reason my preferred sprite looks, dresses and behaves exactly like, well, me) does not lessen this simple enjoyment, nor does it lessen my enjoyment and appreciation for the music in question - indeed, it introduces me to new music, engenders in me a respect I might not otherwise have had for music I don't like so much, and only cements my love for the music I already enjoy.
I don't think anyone who already loves music and/or wants to be/is a musician is going to play RB/GH in preference to playing a real instrument - they'll probably do both. The games will at worst give some folk who'll never do either the chance to pretend they can, and at best, maybe even mean that a few folk who'd never thought about it go on to try it for real.
Re: part 2 of 2
From:no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 12:12 pm (UTC)I made a living in the late 80's early 90's setting up music studios based around Atari STs and Cubase or Notator. Now if I'm based in Edinburgh and easily setup over a hundred small to medium studios in schools, disabled centres, community centres and the majority in bedrooms how many others were doing this in Brum, Manchester, Leeds, London? Nevermind in mainland Europe and America.
Technology can and does empower creativity. Then it was musicians, at the moment everyone and their dog is now a photographer, before both of these it was the home computing - bedroom games revolution. And fit in the point where everyones kids were web designers.
In my opinion what has killed of the music creativity is the so called Music Industry. The death of the single, the near impossibility for talent to shine through the X-Manufactured dross of cover songs and the madness behind suing fans.
What we need is a good depression to bring forth the musical talent. This revolution is cyclic. Already as we hit this financial blip look at the amount of live music on your doorstep. Don't decry the use of technology, walk away from it and see some live music.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 12:20 pm (UTC)I'm not convinced that more people sing nowadays than sang before it was possible to get music at the touch of a button. There was a fantastic documentary short I saw recently from Russia, showing a horrible, cheap, nasty commuter train, full of people heading home in the evening. And there was music _everywhere_. People played instruments, and others joined in to sing along to the songs. I don't remember that ever happening on any train I've been on, or in pubs nowadays - whereas that used to be very common.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 12:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 12:30 pm (UTC)Stiff Little Fingers summed it up just about perfectly in my opinion.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 12:17 pm (UTC)Oh and please give Saints Row 2 some of your time if you are enjoying GTA. So much more fun, and no bloody "Heeeeey Cousin!" phonecalls :D
no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 12:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 12:24 pm (UTC)I'm not a good singer either, and I really love (and still find it hard to believe) that people get together to sing and have fun and it doesn't matter if you're nto very good.
IME, I don't see it as a generational thing, or at least not that way round. My family never did, or do, anything like that. The people who do are all 20- and 30-somethings in my extended circle of friends. I can't think of any middle-ages acquaintances who do.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 01:12 pm (UTC)Similar conditions apply in a lot of the film world - the unions HATE people who will work for less or for free. And in the book world, most authors don't make anything like a living wage.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-15 09:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 01:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 01:59 pm (UTC)At Pad's last birthday quite a few non-musicians had a singalong in her room.
I say the real problem is pubs don't have pianos any more. Find me a pub with a piano and I will take requests.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 06:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 07:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 06:30 pm (UTC)Ekatarina, who *loves* singing at the drop of a hat and encourages others to do the same.
The ultimate anti-capitalist pursuit
Date: 2009-10-15 01:47 pm (UTC)The great thing about singing socially, is that it's completely free - we don't need any speial equipment , all we need is somebody who knows a song that has a good chorus - The thing is, this doesn't sit very well in a consumer society, where our success is measured by the expense of our possessions and the cost of our leisure time activities - there is no money to be made from social singing, so it does not have a value in the consumer society. In the consumer society, we are also made to view society as a hierarchy, so an activity that we can all take part in on a equal basis which offers no scope for class distinction or elitism is also not going to be held up or supported.
Lets break the mould, have some friends over for food, drinks, a good chat and a sing song - It's the ultimate anti-capitalist pursuit!!!
Re: The ultimate anti-capitalist pursuit
Date: 2009-10-15 09:37 pm (UTC)Maybe a somewhat mangled Frankfurt School type argument, of Second Viennese School vs Tin Pan Alley and "jazz", modified by Bourdieu's analysis of hierarchy of taste?
no subject
Date: 2009-10-15 09:44 pm (UTC)