-
Seems like magic to me - I can't see why the brain would magically "fix" itself.
-
On soldiers, and their tastes (and use) of music.
-
On 4 of the Big 5.
-
Oh, for fuck's sake. The fuckers can fuck off. Really.
-
The next 30 years should be fascinating.
-
Not nearly as bad as I heard.
Page Summary
cairmen.livejournal.com - (no subject)
makyo.livejournal.com - (no subject)
endless-psych.livejournal.com - (no subject)
supergee.livejournal.com - (no subject)
the-gardener.livejournal.com - (no subject)
dapperscavenger.livejournal.com - (no subject)
kurosau.livejournal.com - (no subject)
johncoxon.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Active Entries
- 1: Interesting Links for 16-03-2026
- 2: What books did Terry Pratchett find inspirational?
- 3: Life with two children: Gideon updates
- 4: Interesting Links for 15-03-2026
- 5: Interesting Links for 10-03-2026
- 6: Photo cross-post
- 7: Interesting Links for 14-03-2026
- 8: Interesting Links for 13-03-2026
- 9: I need to know when it's okay to tell your partner you love them
- 10: Interesting Links for 11-03-2026
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 11:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 11:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 01:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 03:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 05:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 06:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 06:58 pm (UTC)I make a comment complaining about someone getting carded when I was buying wine.
You leave a comment containing nothing but a link to a load of abuse directed at people making comments complaining about someine getting carded when they were buying wine.
It seems, therefore, that you intend to direct a load of abuse at me. Comments above applying.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 07:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 12:15 pm (UTC)Anyway, I thought there wasn't a legal restriction on parents giving children (over the age of 5?) alcohol in the privacy of their own home. If that's correct (I have at most a vague, theoretical interest in alcohol myself, so I haven't kept up with the legal situation) then Morrisons' behaviour is even more stupid.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 12:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 12:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 12:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 01:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 12:42 pm (UTC)The law also says it is illegal to buy alcohol to supply to those who are underage, which is more relevant in this case. Bearing in mind not only the store, but the individual on the till can be fined/prosecuted if they are found to have supplied alcohol in such circumstances, I can see how those in management could have come up with such a policy. Requiring to see ID from every person present at the checkout may seem rather heavy-handed, and it probably is, but the question here is how much leeway do you give staff to make their own judgement in such situations.
The answer it seems for Morrisons is none.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 12:53 pm (UTC)Though this is hardly a new finding - I can attest that more than 20 years ago it was ... err ... a well established part of the common modus operandi employed by ... err ... certain teenagers.
I'm a regular if rather light drinker (these days), and often buy wine from supermarkets, but I really don't think this news story is a big deal. Honestly - you can manage without a bottle of wine for a couple of days. (If you can't you need to get help.) There are other more outrageous things going on (the 'Terror' laws are one). I don't think this sort of approach to alcohol sales is likely to be of huge help in addressing the serious alcohol problem we have as a society - but I do think that a blanket no-exceptions policy on this sort of thing is a lot easier to get to work at all than the sort of nuanced discretion-for-the-cashier system you'd need to avoid inconveniencing any legal customers.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 12:32 pm (UTC)Dodgy...
I mean have the researchers never heard of expectation effects? It's so close to the rationale behind "forced holding" working it's scary...
I think I may look into this x-cell clinic thing further (If only because it strikes me odd that a clinic in Germany would be called X-cell) surely we'd have heard something about this and it would be mainstream medical research being carried out on multiple sites as oppossed to one private clinic?
no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 12:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 03:36 pm (UTC)Autism woo is both fascinating and pernicious.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 04:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 12:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 02:28 pm (UTC)Maybe bigger chains are more paranoid about such things and smaller stores are more easy going?
no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 02:17 pm (UTC)The next 30 years should be fascinating.
I see that the report you link to mentions Piers Corbyn and his claim that the weather is driven by the sun, and who "is so excited by what he has discovered that he plans to tell the international scientific community at a conference in London at the end of the month".
That would be a first. He's been advancing his solar argument for years, but has consistently refused to explain it either because (he says) it would reveal the secret exploited by his weather forecasting company or because of copyright issues around his theory. Copyright? In science? How does that work, exactly?
This is why he is simply not taken seriously by other climatologists.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 02:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 03:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-12 04:36 pm (UTC)