andrewducker: (Default)
[personal profile] andrewducker

Date: 2009-10-01 12:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] broin.livejournal.com
It's not pithy, it's blithely diminishing an already complex issue. Tilda Swinton doesn't have Eyes Wide Shut rape orgies, nor is Terry Gilliam sitting down to wonder which teenage girls he can rape this week.

As you say, it's a list of people who object to the manner of his arrest. I do too. That's separate from the crime he confessed to.

And where did you get the idea he was a paedophile?

Date: 2009-10-01 12:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] broin.livejournal.com
"A list of people who think that raping 13-year-olds is fine, if you make movies."

I do not think Tilda Swinton and Terry Gilliam are in favor of the rape of 13 year old girls, single or en masse. You do. Right?

Date: 2009-10-01 12:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] broin.livejournal.com
For some people, rape and responsibility is more complex than either/or.

Furthermore, if I felt there was injustice in the arrest of someone, then pointing out that injustice does not mean I condone the alleged or actual crime.

I opposed the extradition of that hacker last month for similar reasons.

Date: 2009-10-01 12:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] broin.livejournal.com
So he lives in Switzerland. Owns property there. But they arrest him at a film festival? Someone is trying to score political points with this.

Date: 2009-10-01 12:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] broin.livejournal.com
Fair enough, but it matters to me for the reason above. And Tilda Swinton, looks like.

Date: 2009-10-01 12:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] broin.livejournal.com
I believe there's an interesting relationship between the Swiss and IRS at the moment and some commenters feel the Swiss has been taking one in the ass from the US government on a number of issues. Even if it's not something so murky, having the filmmaker arrested at a glitzy show is interesting.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] broin.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-10-01 12:40 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] broin.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-10-01 01:01 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] broin.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-10-01 01:11 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] broin.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-10-01 01:11 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2009-10-01 12:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marrog.livejournal.com
This reminds me a little of the Fred Goodwin 16m pension affair. Everybody (including the PM) was all "Give it back, that's not fair!" and he was all "Life's not fair. This was legal," and everyone was all "Give it back anyway!" and he was all "Can't make me, nyah nyah nyah!"

I can certainly picture the US CJS going "Nyah nyah nyah," can't you?

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] marrog.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-10-01 12:59 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2009-10-01 01:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] broin.livejournal.com
You didn't answer this one.

Let's be entirely clear: You're saying I condone child rape, right?

Date: 2009-10-01 02:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] broin.livejournal.com
One set of goalposts at a time, please. ;)

I would be happy to have my name on that petition. You're saying that means I condone child rape. Yep?

Date: 2009-10-01 02:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] broin.livejournal.com
Yes, I absolutely object to this arrest. Colors, mast, nailed.

"A list of people who think that raping 13-year-olds is fine, if you make movies."

"I think they're standing up in defense of someone who raped a 13 year old girl, yes. If that's not tacit defense of the act then what is it?"


So does this mean I condone child rape, or is that reserved for celebrities?

Date: 2009-10-01 02:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] broin.livejournal.com
Apologies! I didn't realise that was a question, rather than rhetorical.

I can oppose the invasion of Iraq without being in favor of Saddam Hussein's tyranny, no? Or be in favor of some pictures of naked 10 year old girls and not child porn, right?

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] broin.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-10-01 02:46 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] broin.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-10-01 02:56 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] broin.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-10-01 03:11 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] broin.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-10-01 03:27 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] broin.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-10-01 02:40 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2009-10-01 08:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] interactiveleaf.livejournal.com
Edit: Actually, he's not been sentenced yet - so he's an alleged child rapist, legally.

No, he's not. He pled guilty. That makes him more than "alleged." It's the judgement (Guilty) that confirms guilt, not the sentencing.

Date: 2009-10-01 03:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lizw.livejournal.com
"Paedophile" strikes me as exactly the right word for someone who likes having sex with thirteen-year-olds. She was a child; people who have sex with children are paedophiles. This particular paedophile is also a rapist. Rapists should be jailed, and age does not entitle them to special treatment, particularly when the reason they are being arrested at an advance age is that they fled from justice. The issues are not at all complex, and everyone who signed that petition or is defending those who did should be ashamed of themselves.

September 2025

S M T W T F S
  12 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 28th, 2025 06:26 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios