Delicious LiveJournal Links for 10-1-2009
Oct. 1st, 2009 12:00 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
-
A reaction to the extreme care some people now take.
-
"You put this in cattle and they stand up and moo and eat and wonder why everyone is looking at them so weird," says William Cohn, a collaborator on the research and director of minimally invasive surgical technology at the Texas Heart Institute. "You see a cow wagging his tail and you say, wow, this is the future of the artificial heart."
-
A drop of common sense.
-
Oh, what I'd pay for a completed Big Numbers.
-
Now _that_'s not going to be winning any hearts or minds
-
Now that was unexpected.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 12:07 pm (UTC)As you say, it's a list of people who object to the manner of his arrest. I do too. That's separate from the crime he confessed to.
And where did you get the idea he was a paedophile?
no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 12:09 pm (UTC)Did anyone say they did?
As you say, it's a list of people who object to the manner of his arrest.
Which strikes me as barking mad. Film festivals are suddenly law-free zones???
And sorry, yes - I'd replace "paedophile" with "rapist", but sadly I can't.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 12:11 pm (UTC)I do not think Tilda Swinton and Terry Gilliam are in favor of the rape of 13 year old girls, single or en masse. You do. Right?
no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 12:13 pm (UTC)I've already seen Whoopi Goldberg offer the incredibly dumb response that "I know it wasn't rape-rape. It was something else but I don't believe it was rape-rape." - which is simply incoherent to me, and does seem to be defending the drugging and rape of a 13 year old as not being sufficiently rape-ish for her to be upset by it. Goodness knows what these other people are thinking.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 12:20 pm (UTC)Furthermore, if I felt there was injustice in the arrest of someone, then pointing out that injustice does not mean I condone the alleged or actual crime.
I opposed the extradition of that hacker last month for similar reasons.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 12:22 pm (UTC)Absolutely. And this is why juries and judges exist, to weigh things up.
I can't understand how his arrest was at all injust, to be honest.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 12:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 12:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 12:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 12:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 12:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 12:53 pm (UTC)I can certainly picture the US CJS going "Nyah nyah nyah," can't you?
no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 12:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 01:57 pm (UTC)Let's be entirely clear: You're saying I condone child rape, right?
no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 02:00 pm (UTC)I haven't heard you speak either way about whether child rapists should face trial.
Got an opinion on the matter?
no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 02:03 pm (UTC)I would be happy to have my name on that petition. You're saying that means I condone child rape. Yep?
no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 02:05 pm (UTC)Edit: Actually, he's not been sentenced yet - so he's an alleged child rapist, legally. From the witness reports he seems to be an actual one, provided she wasn't lying, which he's never accused her of.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 02:28 pm (UTC)"A list of people who think that raping 13-year-olds is fine, if you make movies."
"I think they're standing up in defense of someone who raped a 13 year old girl, yes. If that's not tacit defense of the act then what is it?"
So does this mean I condone child rape, or is that reserved for celebrities?
no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 02:30 pm (UTC)The second is. But "tacit defense" is not the same as "condone". The first can happen accidentally - it's a side-effect. It was also a question, which I'm still waiting for an answer to...
no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 02:34 pm (UTC)I can oppose the invasion of Iraq without being in favor of Saddam Hussein's tyranny, no? Or be in favor of some pictures of naked 10 year old girls and not child porn, right?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 02:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 08:07 pm (UTC)No, he's not. He pled guilty. That makes him more than "alleged." It's the judgement (Guilty) that confirms guilt, not the sentencing.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 09:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 12:11 pm (UTC)Man commits crime.
Man flees country for one with no extradition agreement.
Man enters country which has extradition agreement.
Man is arrested so that he can be extradited to face trial.
I don't see where the complication lies.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 03:39 pm (UTC)