Date: 2009-09-26 09:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] holyoutlaw.livejournal.com
That's pretty amazing.

Date: 2009-09-26 10:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cangetmad.livejournal.com
Amazingly consistent outfit, too. Same tie and everything.

Date: 2009-09-26 05:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] holyoutlaw.livejournal.com
They were taken on the same day. It was a G20 related event hosted by the Obamas. Some details were given in the comments and explanation for the video.

Date: 2009-09-26 10:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] coalescent.livejournal.com
He's going to slowly disappear, bit by bit, and leave only the grin behind...

Date: 2009-09-26 11:14 am (UTC)

Date: 2009-09-26 02:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ms-tek.livejournal.com
What do you expect? He's bringing Chicago style politics to the White House. Great guy, that one.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/24/nyregion/24paterson.html?_r=1

I wish Paterson COULD win, just to stick it to Obama. But he (Paterson) every right to run if he has the funds to do so.

FUCK OBAMA.

Date: 2009-09-26 11:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] whumpdotcom.livejournal.com
You don't understand political parties, do you?

Date: 2009-09-27 12:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ms-tek.livejournal.com
Of course I don't, because I am one of the few who do not think Obama is the second coming of Jesus so I must be stupid/wrong/what have you.

I'm thick as shit.

Date: 2009-09-27 12:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] whumpdotcom.livejournal.com
Did I say Obama was the Messiah, did I say he was right? No.

What I said is that the reality of politics in the US explain the lack of support for Patterson by the leadership of the Democratic party. This has nothing to do with the "Chicago Politics" as you claim (well, maybe if Dailey and not Obama were president.)

Patterson's low numbers endanger the top of the ticket in the upcoming elections. The Democratic party considers the potential loss of a Senate seat to be a greater danger than the loss of a governorship.

You can disagree with the party leadership's decision, but it's the party who determines who will stand for the nomination.

Date: 2009-09-27 12:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ms-tek.livejournal.com
Then you missed the point entirely.

It is _extremely_ uncommon for the President to get involved in issues such as this. It is usually left to the upper echelons of the political party to deal with these kinds of things, because they are negative. A president has no problem when it comes to showing face to boot an election but to say who can or cannot run has traditionally been left up to the lackys because is negative and is publicly humiliating to the person they want to remove.

And Obama REEKS of Chicago Politics and has from the very beginning but its is so easy to overlook since he pees wine.

Truth- this call should have NEVER come from Obama. Once again, I wish Paterson had the numbers or could come up from behind to prove a point. I don't live in NY but was working there when the scandle took place that placed him in office. Paterson is a well spoken man so I do wish him well.

Date: 2009-09-27 06:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] amberite.livejournal.com
The reason why we watch, strangely enough, America's Next Top Model around here is to learn how people learn how to do that sort of thing.

The short version: it's a skill like any other, though some people are naturally better at it to start off with.

Date: 2009-09-27 02:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] martling.livejournal.com
Stand by for the conspiracy theorists claiming this proves he must be a robot controlled by the CIA/Al Quaeda/Illumniati/etc...

October 2025

S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Oct. 5th, 2025 04:53 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios