Date: 2009-08-14 09:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hawkida.livejournal.com
Mostly I'm not especially aware of paying attention to non-obstructive adverts but I believe they still instill an idea of a brand in your mind while you're not paying attention. For example, I bet if I put a word in black in the correct font on a carefully matched green background, then a high percentage of people could identify the Egg branding. There have been studies of similar things related to colours linked with various brands of cigarettes, I believe. Very occasionally something will intrigue me and might eventually lead to them gaining a sale via an actual advert. I get highly frustrated by interstatials and overlays but not to the extent that I can identify products that used them and boycott them.

Date: 2009-08-14 10:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kashandara.livejournal.com
Does the 'Things you might also like' kind of thing that EBay and Amazono both now do count as advertising? Cause that gets me rather a lot...

Date: 2009-08-14 10:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marrog.livejournal.com
It's interesting: they're so helpful and welcome that I barely consider them advertising, since I sort of mentally associate advertising with me being asking to buy things I wouldn't otherwise want.

It's sort of like the (ethical version of) SEO marketing - it actually does what you want it to do by flagging up relevant and useful things when you google them.

Date: 2009-08-14 11:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bracknellexile.livejournal.com
Yup - hence why I ticked the "some other kind of ad I have forgotten" option :)

Date: 2009-08-14 10:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] call-waiting.livejournal.com
The boxing question should be checkboxes since the two things are not mutually exclusive.

Date: 2009-08-14 10:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marrog.livejournal.com
True, I thought that too.

Date: 2009-08-14 11:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ladysisyphus.livejournal.com
When I'm at work, I have to access the internet through a terminal that runs off the mothership's corporate computer systems in California. Thus, images already make my experience laggy, moving .gif ads make me extra-twitchy, and anything made of flash basically stops the system cold. I'm already inclined to hate moving images because of the distraction factor (block 'em, boys!), but this experience has made me hate nearly all image-based advertising on websites.

Date: 2009-08-14 01:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] broin.livejournal.com
Olympic boxing? Sure, it's violent... but only violent in the same way judo is. It's a superb sport, and I'm pleased to see women represented.

Date: 2009-08-14 01:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] broin.livejournal.com
Have you watched any Olympic boxing? Minimal trauma. Fast, skilled, more like fencing. There's more blood in rugby.

Date: 2009-08-14 02:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chuma.livejournal.com
Id be inclined to agree. Amateur boxing is more about technique and scoring points than trying to knock one another out. I would say on the subject of womens boxing though that womens professional boxing is duller than dishwater.

Date: 2009-08-14 02:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] broin.livejournal.com
Is it? How come?

Date: 2009-08-19 03:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] seph-hazard.livejournal.com
Mmmm, I agree - I can see a very good argument for banning boxing. But if boxing isn't banned, then women should be able to do it too!

Date: 2009-08-14 07:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ipslore.livejournal.com
Given your past track record with polls, now I'm wondering how these two could possibly be related.

Date: 2009-08-14 09:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] johncoxon.livejournal.com
[x] Product placement in a film or videogame.

[x] The last question should be checkboxes.
Edited Date: 2009-08-14 09:22 pm (UTC)

Date: 2009-08-14 09:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] johncoxon.livejournal.com
The Matrix Reloaded, I bought a Samsung D500 on the basis that a Samsung was the phone used in the film.

Date: 2009-08-19 03:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] seph-hazard.livejournal.com
You sad, sad geek :-p

August 2025

S M T W T F S
      1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 1314 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 28th, 2025 06:01 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios