andrewducker: (Default)
[personal profile] andrewducker

Date: 2009-03-14 10:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] endless-psych.livejournal.com
Autism thing has vague whiff of forced holding about it... Well on first reading of BBC article anyhow.

Date: 2009-03-14 10:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] endless-psych.livejournal.com
Actually yeah, very dodgy by all accounts...

How are they measuring improvement? Expectation of a postive effect could be what they are measuring rather then a positive effect...

Also a researcher building an "I was initially skeptical but" strawman... Hmmmm not usually a good sign...

Date: 2009-03-14 11:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] endless-psych.livejournal.com
On an unrelated note cafe scientifique is doing a talk on Philosophical proofs and logic and how they relate to coding (I think IIRC) in the Filmhouse on Monday. I may be heading down but thought there was an outside chance it might be of interest to yourself?

Date: 2009-03-16 12:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] endless-psych.livejournal.com
They do something on the Second Monday of each month. Theres a facebook group kicking about somewhere...

Date: 2009-03-14 11:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] endless-psych.livejournal.com
http://autism.about.com/b/2009/03/14/hyperbaric-oxygen-as-a-treatment-for-autism-let-the-buyer-beware.htm

"Before rushing out and demanding HBOT from your doctor or buying your own HBOT system, be aware that this is ONE short term, unreplicated research study conducted by a person who has staked much of his reputation on the effectiveness of HBOT. Consider:

* Dr. Rossignol is "the" proponent of HBOT, and has been speaking at conferences all over the world in support of the treatment. Clearly, he has a personal and professional stake in seeing that the outcomes of a research study are positive.
* The present study was funded by the International Hyperbarics Association, a trade group of private hyperbaric therapy centers. Clearly, they have a similar stake in seeing positive outcomes.
* The present study lasted for only four weeks, while HBOT treatments usually last much longer. It's not clear whether there are consistent or long term gains at all.
* Granted that HBOT is surely safer than some alternative treatments, it is not without risk.
* It is unclear why and how HBOT would make a difference for children with autism. The theory is that the system reduces inflammation in the brain - but that theory is controversial and unproven.
* Home HBOT systems are not the same as hospital systems, and using such a system outside of a medical setting may be useless or even potentially dangerous.
* No insurance company will cover the very high cost of HBOT for autism, as it is considered an experimental and unproven therapy.

Could HBOT actually be a useful tool for treating autism? It's absolutely possible. But until Dr. Rossignol's work has been replicated by researchers with no personal stake, with funding that comes from a neutral source, I'd recommend extreme care in getting involved with the treatment. Certainly, if you're choosing between funding a well-researched therapy versus trying out HBOT, I'd stick with the tried and true."

March 2026

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 5th, 2026 06:15 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios