Date: 2008-11-17 02:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] joexnz.livejournal.com
a, australia can take a fair chunk of that as well
b, how much of that is arable, temperate and capable of sustaining the same population of the countries you've stuff into it?

Date: 2008-11-17 02:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] joexnz.livejournal.com
not andy personally i mean
yes geographically that interesting, but there is an implication after all they choose not to use australia or antartica

Date: 2008-11-17 09:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] drjon.livejournal.com
Actually, Australia's the same size as the US.

Only, the soil is mostly arid fossil or actual desert.

So it could prolly sub for USAnia as the Sahara, in the map.

Date: 2008-11-17 03:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] red-phil.livejournal.com
Try a google image search for 'map population'

It gives an interesting view of how the people of the world are distributed.

It makes the UK look more like you'd expect if you listen to the press.

Date: 2008-11-17 05:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] snarlish.livejournal.com
My god! Africa is a country with the maverick united states in it! Too bad it can't fit the two other members of NAFTA in it, too.

Date: 2008-11-17 10:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-locster.livejournal.com
My first reaction was that this might be wrong due to some misunderstanding about map projections. But no, I checked it out (by sight) on google earth (which conveniently uses a globe) and it looks about right. I suppose you could argue the US is missing its largest state by far - Alaska.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by_area

September 2025

S M T W T F S
  12 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 22nd, 2025 05:12 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios