![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Over here is a discussion I got into predicated on this:
Which is worse - rape or murder?
Got your answer?
You probably answered "murder". Now, would you let your children play rape games? Would you play them yourself? If you answered "no" to either, your next question is: Why are the murder games okay?
Which is worse - rape or murder?
Got your answer?
You probably answered "murder". Now, would you let your children play rape games? Would you play them yourself? If you answered "no" to either, your next question is: Why are the murder games okay?
no subject
Date: 2003-01-13 09:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-01-13 09:24 am (UTC)Rape leaves you mentally and physically bruised and battered. Murder leaves you without a life. Seeing as I don't believe in an afterlife, I view a bruised but alive person as better than no person at all.
no subject
Date: 2003-01-13 09:38 am (UTC)Then again: everyone dies, so in the final analysis 'murder' seems to imply only those deaths which are brought about by another of the same species, and in particular, only that subset of those which meet with Official Disaproval.
On the other hand, not everyone gets raped, and I know of no Official rapes.
When hearing about a murder, the first question in my mind is usually, 'Why did it happen? Could it have been justified?"
but when I hear about a rape, I think "Kill the Bastard now, so it won't happen again."
no subject
Date: 2003-01-13 10:30 am (UTC)But I think we have to differentiate between "worse for the victim" and "a worse act to commit" (the two varying, depending on your moral code). Certainly, rape is possibly worse to commit, as there is never a justification. But Murder is a worse thing to happen to you, I'd say, especially as not doing so would be a grave insult to all those people who have been raped and then have lived lives afterwards. To say to them "better that you had been murdered" would be a grave disservice.