andrewducker: (Default)
[personal profile] andrewducker
Here - with interesting good changes. For instance, breast-feeding icons are now ok again!

Non-photographic images of minors are also now ok also.

Good Lord - a victory for sense!

Date: 2008-05-30 06:43 pm (UTC)
zz: (Default)
From: [personal profile] zz
Non-photographic images of minors

i didn't get that bit. wtf?

Date: 2008-05-30 07:01 pm (UTC)
zz: (Default)
From: [personal profile] zz
Photographs of scantily clad minors are wrong

in a sexual context or at all? if the latter, it's at this point i usually start posting pictures of me age <5 playing naked.

Date: 2008-06-02 05:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] derumi.livejournal.com
Oh, okay. It would be a bit odd if LJ told me to get rid of my icon with me and my sister dressed up as 70's era power rangers.

Date: 2008-05-30 07:03 pm (UTC)
matgb: Artwork of 19th century upper class anarchist, text: MatGB (Default)
From: [personal profile] matgb
The second 'banning' thing last year (boldthrough?) was over a picture of Harry Potter having sex with Snape.

No kids were involved (it was mediocre fanart) but accounts got banned because of it.

September 2025

S M T W T F S
  12 3 4 5 6
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 8th, 2025 04:58 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios