andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2008-05-30 06:59 pm

LJ Policy Update

Here - with interesting good changes. For instance, breast-feeding icons are now ok again!

Non-photographic images of minors are also now ok also.

Good Lord - a victory for sense!
zz: (Default)

[personal profile] zz 2008-05-30 06:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Non-photographic images of minors

i didn't get that bit. wtf?
zz: (Default)

[personal profile] zz 2008-05-30 07:01 pm (UTC)(link)
Photographs of scantily clad minors are wrong

in a sexual context or at all? if the latter, it's at this point i usually start posting pictures of me age <5 playing naked.

[identity profile] derumi.livejournal.com 2008-06-02 05:57 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, okay. It would be a bit odd if LJ told me to get rid of my icon with me and my sister dressed up as 70's era power rangers.
matgb: Artwork of 19th century upper class anarchist, text: MatGB (Default)

[personal profile] matgb 2008-05-30 07:03 pm (UTC)(link)
The second 'banning' thing last year (boldthrough?) was over a picture of Harry Potter having sex with Snape.

No kids were involved (it was mediocre fanart) but accounts got banned because of it.