Shocking, shocking news
Sep. 4th, 2007 09:13 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Women choose wealthy partners, men choose sexy ones. - one wonders what the conflation between "wealthy" and "good at something" is in that study.
Also Kissing means more to women than men - apparently women use kissing to assess the person they're kissing. Which strikes me as a good reason why so many women end up with appalling partners.
Also Kissing means more to women than men - apparently women use kissing to assess the person they're kissing. Which strikes me as a good reason why so many women end up with appalling partners.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-04 08:23 am (UTC)Is "less" a typo, do you think?
no subject
Date: 2007-09-04 08:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-04 08:43 am (UTC)Rough translation = Why so many women fail to end up with me ?
no subject
Date: 2007-09-04 09:03 am (UTC)I feel sure that Lilian has told you of various ways that I've been an appalling partner in my time...
no subject
Date: 2007-09-04 10:01 am (UTC)While humans may pride themselves on being highly evolved, most still behave like the stereotypical Neanderthals when it comes to choosing a mate.
What utter, utter bollocks. People from a society where they are told from a young age that looks are important when men chose partners and money is important for women, when put into an nonsense situation[1] act on this message. This proves fuck all about evolution.
[1]is speed dating in any way like how mate selection has been done over evolutionary time? I don't think so.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-04 10:21 am (UTC)it was a stupid way to phrase it (not east cos we have very little idea about neanderthal social behaviour), and cultural influences do have some effect, but there are physically based reasons why males and females might have differently weighted priorities in mate selection, since breeding is more resource-draining on a female.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-04 10:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-04 10:08 am (UTC)For that to be true, the supply of appalling partners has to be pretty abundant, eh?
As to the kissing thing - I am honestly surprised that anyone doesn't consider being decent at it to be important. Anyone for the male POV here? Do guys *really* not care that much? Is it just that in a straight choice between good kiss and no sex and iffy kiss and sex that he latter scenario wins out? Cos that's a bit more understandable (though I must admit that I wouldn't be expecting the sex to be any better than iffy).
If affectionate or sexual contact with the person is not pleasant, I can't see why you'd do it - and therefore why you'd be be in a relationship with them - as opposed to being just friends. I know people do it - and intellectually, logically, the partner may have every other good quality going - but I can't see how that can be expected to work *as a relationship* if you dislike the way the smell/can't bear to touch/kiss them/be touched by them/kissed by them or if you don't enjoy the sex.
Unless, of course, neither of you is ever interested in that sort of thing with anyone, then I could maybe see it.
Otherwise the partner is going to sense that physical reluctance as emotional distance, if nothing else. Close physical contact is incredibly bonding - and that is something most people want/need at an emotional level, at least to some degree. If you don't get it from each other, then what happens?
no subject
Date: 2007-09-04 11:04 am (UTC)Who doesn't? According to the article pretty much everyone does - just not for all the same reasons.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-04 01:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-04 01:09 pm (UTC)Men do tend to be much more basic about this stuff. Provided there's some sort of friction being applied to their penis they don't give a damn about anything else (generalising wildly).
no subject
Date: 2007-09-04 03:42 pm (UTC)i do hope to do rather better than that, generally (and it does seem appreciated).
no subject
Date: 2007-09-04 10:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-04 04:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-05 01:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-04 11:41 am (UTC)Gotta love articles that try to pin down gender-related behaviour / gender-differences.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-04 12:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-04 01:07 pm (UTC)I give not a sh*t about the financial status of my partners either way. Maybe that's common in women who aren't looking to be financially supported.
They *do* have to be sexy - oh yes, very much so....
no subject
Date: 2007-09-04 01:10 pm (UTC)"So, why don't you care about having your elbows rubbed?"
no subject
Date: 2007-09-04 03:43 pm (UTC)OK, neferet - what DO you care about more than kissing??
no subject
Date: 2007-09-04 05:09 pm (UTC)The article says women use kissing to assess a partner - I use appearance, conduct and scent - and to maintain intimacy/guage the staus - I generally work on whether they want to a) cuddle up and b) want sex. I just don't see how a kiss can give you a decent picture or a person or where you stand with them.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-04 03:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-04 03:46 pm (UTC)I'd add that kisses are damned sexy as well as affecionate. It's a whole body thing, not just the mouth/tounge, ya know? Or at least the way I do it is (some people have found that [pleasurably] surprising, though, so clearly not everyone does the same).
no subject
Date: 2007-09-04 04:17 pm (UTC)