Screaming Queens at 10 O'Clock
Jan. 2nd, 2006 11:53 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I went to see The Producers a few days ago, and came out of it feeling remarkably unsure of my feelings.
Not about the movie itself (it's a competent filming of a fun musical stage-show. Worth seeing, with some wonderful moments.) but about its portrayal of gay people.
The director of the musical within the musical is gay. And screamingly camp. As is his "live-in" entourage. All of whom delight in dressing up as members of the Village People and prancing around. Except for the lesbian, obviously, who wears a shirt and is dumpy.
In other words, they're remarkably obvious caricatures. Who are then used to make jokes about gay sex and campness.
Should I be offended by this?
I mean, I'm not gay. And I know there _are_ remarkably camp people out there. And also butch lesbians in shirts.
But if the caricatures had been similarly broad takes on, say, black people - we'd have been watching blacked-up white people doing a modern Black and White Minstrel Show, and a huge fuss would have been made.
So I feel like I should have been offended, but I'm not entirely sure. Anyone else got a take on it?
Not about the movie itself (it's a competent filming of a fun musical stage-show. Worth seeing, with some wonderful moments.) but about its portrayal of gay people.
The director of the musical within the musical is gay. And screamingly camp. As is his "live-in" entourage. All of whom delight in dressing up as members of the Village People and prancing around. Except for the lesbian, obviously, who wears a shirt and is dumpy.
In other words, they're remarkably obvious caricatures. Who are then used to make jokes about gay sex and campness.
Should I be offended by this?
I mean, I'm not gay. And I know there _are_ remarkably camp people out there. And also butch lesbians in shirts.
But if the caricatures had been similarly broad takes on, say, black people - we'd have been watching blacked-up white people doing a modern Black and White Minstrel Show, and a huge fuss would have been made.
So I feel like I should have been offended, but I'm not entirely sure. Anyone else got a take on it?
no subject
Date: 2006-01-03 12:02 am (UTC)Anything with stereotypes, or jokes about a particular subculture/racial group/religious group.. whatever...
List a few different groups in your head, and ask yourself if you'd be comfortable with those jokes being made about -them-.
So if you wouldn't be comfortable with that kind of stereotyping of, to continue your example, black people, then it's pretty damn clear how repulsive it must have been.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-03 12:05 am (UTC)I think I feel surprised that other people aren't being repulsed by it.
But then - take Are You Being Served - that's just as bad. Should I be outraged that the BBC are re-releasing it on DVD?
Or Julian Clary - he's a caricature of a gay person. Only he's gay himself.
Is it like black people being allowed to use the word "nigger"? Are gay people allowed to be caricatures of gay people, but straight people aren't?
no subject
Date: 2006-01-03 12:14 am (UTC)Some would say julian clary is okay to do it, because he's gay
Others might say the fact that people find it funny at all speaks of a deeper malaise in those finding him funny, and he's as bad for playing up to that.
Look at the still widely-held beliefs that gay people are more predatory than heterosexuals, that they're very likely to be pedophiles too, that they do X, Y and Z.
It all comes down to drawing a line between what you do and don't tolerate, and at some level, it's going to be personal. I find Will & Grace offensive (as well as just being not very good), but I can quite see that many people wouldn't, and I'm hardly going to complain.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-03 12:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-03 12:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-03 02:06 pm (UTC)Instead of making the comparison with offensive charicatures of black people, what about making it with AliG-esque apeing of obnoxious hand waving bling wearing ganstas? Is it still offensive?
Or is it only offensive because people don't know that all queers aren't like that, whereas they're assumed to know that not all black people are like that? And do they? And is that the fault of the comedians? Is it our duty as joke-tellers to stop telling Scotsman/Englishman/Irishman jokes because some people think Irish people are thick?
I should add that I'm just picking a random side here. I have no opinion, strangely enough. I tend to go with a gut "Does it make me uncomfortable?", and I haven't seen the film yet.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-03 12:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-03 12:08 am (UTC)I guess I've come to terms with the fact that I should just follow my conscience. My conscience says no to Memoirs, but yes to Will & Grace.
I wonder sometimes if it's the thousand such little hypocrisies and betrayals of self that make us human.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-03 12:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-03 11:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-03 01:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-03 11:32 am (UTC)Oh and dont get me started on Will and Fucking Grace. Name me one mainstream show that doesnt portray its gay charcters as GAY. Name me one show that has moved us on from "are you being served" because i must have missed it.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-03 02:18 pm (UTC)filmshowfilm
Date: 2006-01-03 02:52 pm (UTC)The little mermaid rocked.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-03 12:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-03 05:27 pm (UTC)I've had a similar reaction as you describe, though, to watching the animated version of "The Boondocks." I love the comic strip and the TV cartoon is quite funny -- but, as I said to a black friend recently, I find myself wondering how I'd respond to it if I was, oh, black. Because unlike the strip, the TV version is very heavily into the whole "niggers is crazy" thing, to the point of being positively insulting ... in the name of satire.
His response? That yeah, it's too much nigga-this and nigga-that and he finds it obnoxious.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-03 06:25 pm (UTC)That said, regarding 'Are you Being Served?'. The humour with that character is that, according to the actor at least, he's not actually gay and it's playing around with peoples assumptions. I actually quite like that. Whether that's just hypocrisy I dunno. :)
Someone else asked about gay characters in shows who aren't just GAY, and I think the only show that comes to mind is 'Six Feet Under'. It's preachy at times, but at least characters are allowed a degree of humanity and depth.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-03 07:28 pm (UTC)And Buffy of course :-)
no subject
Date: 2006-01-03 07:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-03 09:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-03 10:18 pm (UTC)Probably not all the same people - although I do wonder how big the crossover was.
Re - Gay males on Buffy
Date: 2006-01-04 07:01 pm (UTC)With you about Graham Norton. Thankfully he doesn't seem to be around anymore. Either that or I'm just getting good at avoiding him.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-03 11:04 pm (UTC)