Nearly perfect election result
Oct. 1st, 2004 08:23 amBy-election last night
Liberal-Democrats got a swing of 19%, cutting the Labour majority from 17,000 votes to 2,000 votes. Nearly an amazing success, and still pretty impressive.
More impressively, the Tories got pushed from second place to _fourth_, behind the racist scumbags known as the UK Independence Party. I'm not in favour of the UKIP, but seeing the conservatives pushed into fourth place almost makes it worthwhile.
More details here.
(Anyone know what a swing that big would do to the national elections?)
Liberal-Democrats got a swing of 19%, cutting the Labour majority from 17,000 votes to 2,000 votes. Nearly an amazing success, and still pretty impressive.
More impressively, the Tories got pushed from second place to _fourth_, behind the racist scumbags known as the UK Independence Party. I'm not in favour of the UKIP, but seeing the conservatives pushed into fourth place almost makes it worthwhile.
More details here.
(Anyone know what a swing that big would do to the national elections?)
no subject
Date: 2004-10-01 12:54 am (UTC)Oh...hang on....
no subject
Date: 2004-10-01 01:10 am (UTC)However, Iain Wright seems to be suffering an altered perception where up is down, left is right and black is white. Which would explain his claim that "Tonight's result is great news for Tony Blair, a huge disappointment for Charles Kennedy and an absolute disaster for Michael Howard."
While I can't disagree with the last part, I don't think TB will be taking much comfort in a candidate who managed to lose 12,000 previously rock-solid Labour votes and less than half the electorate bothering to turn out.
Time to reopen the debate on making voting compulsory?
no subject
Date: 2004-10-01 04:34 am (UTC)But I bet that Kennedy did have higher (if unfounded) hopes.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-01 05:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-01 07:04 am (UTC)The United States needs one of them...
no subject
Date: 2004-10-01 11:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-01 01:38 pm (UTC)