Date: 2025-01-26 12:01 pm (UTC)
simont: A picture of me in 2016 (Default)
From: [personal profile] simont
The contrast between #5 and #6 is striking. The Lib Dems clearly think that the more people know about voting reform, the more they'll like it!

Date: 2025-01-26 05:41 pm (UTC)
calimac: (Default)
From: [personal profile] calimac
I presume they think that low information was the reason for the loss of the AV referendum in the Cameron-Clegg era.

It's grim up north...

Date: 2025-01-26 12:29 pm (UTC)
rhythmaning: (Armed Forces)
From: [personal profile] rhythmaning
I think the post on the north of England could just have stopped with the Norman conquest. The harrying of the north and subsequent famine could account for much (just as wealth inequality in the UK can be traced back to the establishment of Norman aristocracy).

Still, the other ills identified clearly didn't help. The limited education - the lack of universities - is particularly interesting! I hadn't realised Durham university wasn't established until 19C (I just googled it to check).

Re: It's grim up north...

Date: 2025-01-26 07:38 pm (UTC)
errolwi: (Default)
From: [personal profile] errolwi
I listen to The British History podcast, currently in the 1090s. The Harrying was the first thing I thought of when I saw the link.

Date: 2025-01-26 12:31 pm (UTC)
juan_gandhi: (Default)
From: [personal profile] juan_gandhi
Thank you! Good stuff.
So, UK is still a colony of the Normans. Sad. Explains something.
Edited Date: 2025-01-26 12:53 pm (UTC)

Date: 2025-01-26 03:28 pm (UTC)
channelpenguin: (Default)
From: [personal profile] channelpenguin
Throughout Europe, the same richest families from very far back, 15C at least, (probably further) are STILL the richest to this day. If they also geographically stay put then the same areas would tend to stay rich (likely, as they are also likely the landowners)
Well, contain all the richest people at least...

1.

Date: 2025-01-26 03:24 pm (UTC)
channelpenguin: (Default)
From: [personal profile] channelpenguin
Wasn't there also deliberate "sabotage" of Birmingham and Glasgow (maybe others?) in the 80s(?). They were deliberately let get run down? I'm sure it was you I got the link from of the article I read sometime in the past few years.

Re: 1.

Date: 2025-01-26 03:45 pm (UTC)
greenwoodside: (Default)
From: [personal profile] greenwoodside
I remember reading the same article, and probably got it from Andrew's dreadmwidth too.

This isn't the same one, but it follows similar lines.

The attempts to break growth in the West Midlands were earlier than the eighties – the above cites the 1956 West Midlands plan, encouraging Birmingham to try and actively reduce its population.
Edited Date: 2025-01-26 03:46 pm (UTC)

Re: 1.

Date: 2025-01-26 04:23 pm (UTC)
channelpenguin: (Default)
From: [personal profile] channelpenguin
Thanks! yes, that is part of what I recall.

Ridiculous way to run a country. But of course, only if one thinks a country should be run fairly for the benefit of all of its inhabitants. Sigh

Re: 1.

Date: 2025-01-26 04:39 pm (UTC)
channelpenguin: (Default)
From: [personal profile] channelpenguin
Hmm. Don't think so. Maybe I did other reading myself at the time prompted by an article you posted.

Interesting that the strangling of expansion was supposedly intended also for London ... and that somehow that seems not too have happened.

I'm the child of a mother decanted from inner city Glasgow to an estate (2 story apartment buildings, not hi rise). In many ways the desert described, but the living conditions of the actual building were VASTLY better. I was born back in the city, but then we moved to a New Town - which as planned, worked pretty well. Later private development and lack of services/service run down pretty much messed it up, though. After I'd left.

Re: 1.

Date: 2025-01-26 04:46 pm (UTC)
greenwoodside: (Default)
From: [personal profile] greenwoodside
Sigh, indeed.

Yesterday I was muttering Burns to wistfully to myself: For a' that and a' that, It's comin' yet for a' that, That man to man the world o'er, Shall brothers be, for a' that.

A country run for all its citizens can go into the same wish- kitty.

I lived for a year in Birmingham. Great city with some of the nicest colleagues I've ever had.
Edited Date: 2025-01-26 04:47 pm (UTC)

Date: 2025-01-26 03:59 pm (UTC)
chickenfeet: (bull)
From: [personal profile] chickenfeet
Northerner here; Manchester born, Durham educated! I think there's a key issue missing here. For much of the 19th and early 20th century Sterling was lept at an artificially inflated level so that foreign manufacturing interests could compete against British manufacturers and thereby earn enough Sterling to satisfy their countries borrowing costs. This greatly benefited British financial interests (almost entirely London based) and the rentier class which largely nvested abroad (mostly domiciles in the SE). Of course it massively retarded investment in Northewrn manufacturing which became steadily less competitive especially in "new" industries like chemicals and electrical stuff.

Date: 2025-01-26 04:34 pm (UTC)
redbird: closeup of me drinking tea, in a friend's kitchen (Default)
From: [personal profile] redbird
Item (3) reminds me that "tree" isn't a taxonomic category, it's a description of a pattern of growth that arises over and over in very different species of land plants: oaks and palms and bananas, and ancient tree ferns. The same modern species of maple may be a tree in most of its range, and a low shrub at the edges of where it can live.

Date: 2025-01-26 05:06 pm (UTC)
falena: illustration of a blue and grey moth against a white background (Default)
From: [personal profile] falena

Thanks for the link about Northern England. As a foreigner it's something I've always wondered about.

April 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 2223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 23rd, 2025 07:18 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios