Date: 2023-08-03 02:47 am (UTC)
cellio: (Default)
From: [personal profile] cellio

I might never look at my granola & yogurt the same way again. :-)

Date: 2023-08-07 06:54 am (UTC)
hairyears: Spilosoma viginica caterpillar: luxuriant white hair and a 'Dougal' face with antennae. Small, hairy, and venomous (Default)
From: [personal profile] hairyears
The short answer is that Sizewell C's contracts are very, very murky indeed...

But not as murky as te shenanigans with Hinckley Point.

The charitable guess is thay ministers were desperate to get a power station built at any cost.

However, the Cameron cabinet's action in cancelling the NEI contracts when they had actually started forging the reactor casings only makes sense as a deliberate attempt to kill off the UK's remaining capacity to do the heavy Engineering for power stations.

We do actually need these power stations - we are still facing serious shortfalls in generating capacity - but every single decision in the process, since 2010, has seemed like a deliberate attempt make them even more costly.


Edited (Spelling ) Date: 2023-08-07 06:59 am (UTC)

Date: 2023-08-09 06:57 am (UTC)
hairyears: Spilosoma viginica caterpillar: luxuriant white hair and a 'Dougal' face with antennae. Small, hairy, and venomous (Default)
From: [personal profile] hairyears
I don't have hard numbers for Sizewell, but the contracted and committed prices in the Hinckley Point project now exceed the projected prices for the Severn Barrage.

The definite answer would be to cost-up the European hydro storage projects *and the transmission work* plus an equeal investment in offshore wind, for a capacity equal to Sizewell C.

Also... Not hiding the costs of ongoing coastline stabilisation work for the Sizewell site.

February 2026

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22232425262728

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 22nd, 2026 11:39 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios