andrewducker: (Default)
[personal profile] andrewducker

Date: 2018-01-17 03:20 pm (UTC)
autopope: Me, myself, and I (Default)
From: [personal profile] autopope
The "NHS losing 10% of its nurses per year" story is dodgy, IMO.

First, you'd expect an average 4-5% loss rate per year just through aging and retirement, assuming a 40 year career duration.

Second, nurses are overwhelmingly — 90% — female in the UK. So you'd expect a very high proportion — 50-80% — to take maternity leave at some point, and of those, many won't return to work until their children are in infants school or older.

Of an initial cohort entering the work force aged 22, probably 80% have left by the time they hit 42, although subsequently a number will return. Which gets you to a 10% per year wastage rate.

Below the lede, the article says that the attrition rate is up 20% over five years ago, which would be alarming ...until you consider the proportion of NHS nurses who are non-UK EU citizens, and look at the effect of Brexit on EU workers in the UK.

Finally, consider the proportion of nurses employed by non-NHS private medical services that are taking on subcontracted NHS work. This proportion is clearly rising (thank you, Chris Grayling) and will obviously impact the attrition rate among NHS nurses as the units they work for are privatized by the back door.

Date: 2018-01-17 03:40 pm (UTC)
danieldwilliam: (Default)
From: [personal profile] danieldwilliam

A decrease in spending on renewable is not great news.

But some of that decrease will be the result of falling costs and some of it will be a relative decrease from a position that involved accelerating projects to get them included in the previous funding regime.

The UK has put a reasonable amount of money in to renewable deployment over the last few decades. I'm not horrified if we've adjusted our subsidy regime down so that some other countries, with less developed easy to exploit resources pay for the next round of build out.

Date: 2018-01-17 04:33 pm (UTC)
danieldwilliam: (Default)
From: [personal profile] danieldwilliam
I may well be on the new sleeper service at some point later in the year.

I shall let you know how it is.

Date: 2018-01-17 08:24 pm (UTC)
agoodwinsmith: (Default)
From: [personal profile] agoodwinsmith
I hate Uber and that whole business model so much.

Safety regulations are never adopted voluntarily by capitalist entities, only grudgingly, slowly implemented at the last possible minute when mandated by law resulting from labour action. Organizations that shove workers back into unsafe conditions are not "disruptive innovators" but old-fashioned greedy shits who believe peasants aren't real people. People working in head offices aren't the peasants.

Also: tax evasion: also not disruptive innovation, just another greedy shit wanting to use infrastructure (roads, snow clearing, etc etc) for free. Shkreli is just the pimple on the current oozy zeitgeist boil.

Date: 2018-01-18 02:59 am (UTC)
zotz: (Default)
From: [personal profile] zotz
One study finding no evidence is not that same as studies in general finding no evidence. One study, in general, is worth very little unless replicated.

Date: 2018-01-18 04:43 am (UTC)
darkoshi: (Default)
From: [personal profile] darkoshi
Did you generate this entry differently than usual? The link tags didn't get copied to the entry level tags.

Sleeper trains

Date: 2018-01-19 12:49 pm (UTC)
anef: (Default)
From: [personal profile] anef
Yes, they look very posh, but what about the mattresses? We went up to Scotland on the sleeper a few years ago and it was memorably uncomfortable. Not quite as bad as camping in Greece, but I don't remember getting much sleep.

February 2026

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 2728

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 28th, 2026 12:36 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios