andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2018-01-09 12:00 pm

Interesting Links for 09-01-2018

danieldwilliam: (Default)

[personal profile] danieldwilliam 2018-01-09 06:16 pm (UTC)(link)
I agree that May takes the Brexit vote seriously.

However, I think in this context (both the internal Tory split and the national split) it is only your position before the vote that counts. If you were for staying in the EU before the vote you are a Remainer and shall always be a Remainer.

Which is where May's problems here begin - she isn't trusted by either camp.
mountainkiss: (Default)

[personal profile] mountainkiss 2018-01-09 06:25 pm (UTC)(link)

Fair enough, although I do think it's important not to refer to her as a Remainer because it's so misleading. Nothing about her leadership can be interpreted through that lens.

calimac: (Default)

[personal profile] calimac 2018-01-09 06:35 pm (UTC)(link)
"Remainer" is actually best seen as an obsolete term these days, more useful in discussing a politician's past history or their general mental cast than their current position, rather like using "appeaser" after the outbreak of WW2. There were no more appeasers, but it was sometimes still useful in analyzing what a person would do next, e.g. if they sought a negotiated peace.

Similarly, what today are sometimes called "Remainers" are actually "Overturners," as in they wish to overturn the Referendum. That's a more extreme position than having opposed the Referendum at the time, and should be judged separately. A Remainer then might be an Overturner now, but has not changed position if they accept the Referendum results, because that was then and this is now. There might be a correlation between Remainers-then and Soft Exiters-now, and that's where it's useful to identify who was then a Remainer.
danieldwilliam: (Default)

[personal profile] danieldwilliam 2018-01-10 10:00 am (UTC)(link)
Not refering to her as a Remainer is to give her a different ideological label and one that attempts to change the national discourse from Brexit to post-Brexit.

It allows the conversation to move on from the question of EU membership.

Which is fine, if that is what one wants to do, but if one wants the UK to remain or rejoin the EU then Remainers must remain Remainers until Brexiteers wonder off to do something else.
mountainkiss: (Default)

[personal profile] mountainkiss 2018-01-10 10:03 am (UTC)(link)

She is not a Remainer. She is a whole-hearted Brexiteer and will continue to be one. Nothing about her wants to stay in the European Union. What she was before the referendum is not relevant any more.

danieldwilliam: (Default)

[personal profile] danieldwilliam 2018-01-10 10:14 am (UTC)(link)
I think our disagreement here is about whether the past or the future is the most relevant. Are people allowed to change sides?

I don't disagree with you that she is fully behind her espoused policy of leaving the EU in accordance with the expressed will of the British people.

It is unclear what her position would be if the opinion polls were running 60% for Remain.

As always I suspect that a Tory hasn't changed their mind on something important so much as they have realised that saying and doing something different leaves the Tory Party in power.

I don't think she enjoys the full trust and confidence of the pre-referendum Brexiteers because of her prior position. They suspect she is either a fair weather friend or working to bring down Brexit from within.

Perhaps more importantly if we move to a position where people are allowed to shift from being Remainers to Brexiteers then we are accepting that Britain will be leaving the EU and not re-joining. If one wants Britain to rejoin the EU then Remainers must be prepared to carry a grudge about it for decades to come.
mountainkiss: (Default)

[personal profile] mountainkiss 2018-01-10 10:16 am (UTC)(link)

I don't think we get to choose on Theresa May's part whether she is to carry a grudge about it for decades. She is fully committed to carrying out what she regards as the democratic result of the referendum.

danieldwilliam: (Default)

[personal profile] danieldwilliam 2018-01-10 10:22 am (UTC)(link)
No we don't get to directly chosse what she thinks and what she wants to do.

But we get to decide how we label that. Pragmatic democrat or traitor. A bad Remainer or a New Brexiteer. Honourable or wretched. Right or wrong.

And through that label influence others.
mountainkiss: (Default)

[personal profile] mountainkiss 2018-01-10 10:23 am (UTC)(link)

We do, but any label implying that there is any meaning now for her in her previous conviction is inaccurate.

danieldwilliam: (Default)

[personal profile] danieldwilliam 2018-01-10 10:26 am (UTC)(link)
The label has consequences for her, even if she wants to move beyond it.

Part of her current advantage is that she is sufficiently in both camps to survive. Part of her problem is that her room for manouvre is limited because she is not fully trusted by either side.

And this sort of grudge keeping is exactly what I was talking about on Sunday.
mountainkiss: (Default)

[personal profile] mountainkiss 2018-01-10 10:30 am (UTC)(link)

In my view the negative consequences of the inaccuracy of the label when applied to her, with its consequent dilutions of both the integrity of the labeller and the meaning of the label, outweigh any positive consequences in this context.

danieldwilliam: (Default)

[personal profile] danieldwilliam 2018-01-10 10:31 am (UTC)(link)
I would expect you to take such an open and honest approach.

It is good that at least one of us is not being corrupted by Brexit.