Interesting Links for 31-12-2015
Dec. 31st, 2015 12:00 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
- The human migration out of Africa left its mark in mutations
- US military shelves Google robot plan over noise concerns
- Why 2015 Was a Breakthrough Year in Artificial Intelligence
- Rebrickable: LEGO inspiration from the kits you already own
- Irish DNA originated in Middle East and eastern Europe
- What if Harry Potter had been a squib? (I could not put this down)
- Freak storm pushes North Pole 50 degrees (Farenheit) above normal to melting point
no subject
Date: 2015-12-31 08:11 pm (UTC)"and where a startup named DeepMind showed off an AI that could learn to play computer games before it was acquired by Google."
no subject
Date: 2015-12-31 11:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-01-01 12:07 am (UTC)Interestingly, it seems there's been a shift in the approach China's tech giants take towards startups - who used to be more prone to copying than buying...
https://www.techinasia.com/china-tech-titans-startups-partnerships
no subject
Date: 2016-01-01 05:32 am (UTC)My, how quickly things change - now we're Middle Eastern, too, oh boy. :)
ETA: I just read beyond the title of your link (and re-read the article I linked you to as well, to refresh my memory) and isn't it sort of a stretch to call the Russian Steppes "Middle Eastern"? I'm having a little difficulty with that.
Also, how can neither genetic study overlap the other in terms of their results? ie., the one that concludes the Irish/Scots/Brits are Basque Spaniard does not conclude we're Middle Eastern; the one that concludes we're Middle Eastern says nothing about Basque Spanish ancestry (the closest it gets to that is "Eastern European", which is like throwing a snowball in Europe's general direction and not really giving a flying leap where it lands).
How does one reconcile these two reports? I'm Irish, whatever the heck that means, so it does sort of matter to me that this so-called genetic evidence can be played so fast, so loose, and so inaccurately (or, at the very least, so incompletely).
no subject
Date: 2016-01-02 02:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-01-02 12:10 pm (UTC)