andrewducker: (Default)
[personal profile] andrewducker

Date: 2012-08-02 12:44 pm (UTC)
dalglir: Default (Default)
From: [personal profile] dalglir
I love that the guns on the mech are triggered by the pilot smiling - a "smile shot". Very, very silly :)

Date: 2012-08-02 03:04 pm (UTC)
erratio: (Default)
From: [personal profile] erratio
"50 Shades of Grey... beating off Harry Potter". Intentional double entendre?

Date: 2012-08-02 03:44 pm (UTC)
simont: A picture of me in 2016 (Default)
From: [personal profile] simont
007 - The Business of Bond

It would be nice to be able to click another button that said "normalise all budgets to 1 so I can see which films had the best ROI".

Also, the fact sheet you get if you mouse over each one totally needs to become a Top Trumps deck.

But the best thing about the whole site is the cute little icon they've worked out to represent each Bond film :-)

Date: 2012-08-02 07:17 pm (UTC)
soon_lee: Image of yeast (Saccharomyces) cells (Default)
From: [personal profile] soon_lee
...beating off Harry Potter.

Dearie, dearie me.

Date: 2012-08-02 07:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] philmophlegm.livejournal.com
Worthy of my Sid James userpic!

Date: 2012-08-02 08:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skreidle.livejournal.com
That phrase.. Perhaps it does not mean what he things it means (in Scotland)? :)

Date: 2012-08-02 08:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skreidle.livejournal.com
But I don't think of Daniel Radcliffe that way! (Not even in Equus!)

Date: 2012-08-02 08:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skreidle.livejournal.com
Blindsight: Incredible!

Date: 2012-08-02 10:42 pm (UTC)
simont: A picture of me in 2016 (Default)
From: [personal profile] simont
The more I learn about the brain the less important I think the conscious mind is.

There's some kind of odd self-defeatingness about this statement. Surely '... the less important I intuitively sense the conscious mind is'? :-)

Saving was too COMPLEX for people?

Date: 2012-08-02 10:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gwendally.livejournal.com
So the theory is that people don't save because they were being offered to much in the way of fancy marketing?

So the answer is to get rid of incentive specials?

LOL.

Re: Saving was too COMPLEX for people?

Date: 2012-08-03 03:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] drdoug.livejournal.com
It does, but what's being suggested here isn't offering any of that - in contrast to the previous CAT scheme, there's no cap on charges or fees.

Now is not a bad time for a fundamental overhaul of consumer protection in the financial services industry, but this is emphatically not that. This is a gimmicky scheme that, if it succeeds, will increase the savings rate - which is really, really not what we want in the middle of an ongoing deleveraging crisis.

Re: Saving was too COMPLEX for people?

Date: 2012-08-02 10:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] philmophlegm.livejournal.com
Stupid person: I don't understand "saving". What is it? How do I do it?

Enlightened person: Remember last weekend, when you got in your car, drove into town, parked the car in the shopping centre car park, got out, went into a shop, picked out something you'd like to own, took it to the counter, paid for it and left?

Stupid person: Yeah...

Enlightened person: Well, "saving" is when you don't do that. You can do it without moving. In fact, "saving" is actually the default state.

Stupid person: Ah, ok. I get it.

Enlightened person: One more thing though, and this is important. Don't do all of the above except for the payment bit. That's called "shoplifting" and is illegal.

July 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 2 3 4 5
6 7 89 10 11 12
13 141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 14th, 2025 06:34 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios