Date: 2012-05-05 11:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bart-calendar.livejournal.com
Won't people just download VLC Media Player?

It's already better then the player that comes with Windows 7 and is free.

Date: 2012-05-05 12:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
Also, physical media is dead - so anyone who wants to use in a computer it is a specialist/collector, who presumably then also wants to use software with more features than WMP *anyway*.

Date: 2012-05-05 04:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] philmophlegm.livejournal.com
Yeah, let's be honest, that's what people have had to do for the last few versions of Windows anyway because it probably had the codec you needed and Windows didn't.

Date: 2012-05-07 09:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] channelpenguin.livejournal.com
oooh love the icon!

Date: 2012-05-05 04:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] strawberryfrog.livejournal.com
From TFA it seems that the reason for this is the costs of licencing the codecs (increases the cost of a windows licence). So VLC and the like is the answer.

Does VLC come with codecs needed, or will it need a codec pack?

Date: 2012-05-05 06:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] khoth.livejournal.com
VLC does come with the codecs. The licensing isn't because nobody else can make a codec, it's because of patents. I'm not sure why MPEG-LA (the evil organistion in question) hasn't tried to do something about it, but I'm guessing it's to do with the legality of software patents not being a settled question in all jurisdictions, and if they try to crack down they have no hope of actually getting licensing fees, but would probably just get bad publicity for the sole result of making people download VLC from a server in a different country.

Date: 2012-05-05 07:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bart-calendar.livejournal.com
VLC has all the codecs for free.

Date: 2012-05-05 11:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bart-calendar.livejournal.com
Also, it took me a minute to find that cat gif.

One of the other gifs was somewhat distracting.

Date: 2012-05-05 11:53 am (UTC)

Date: 2012-05-05 09:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skington.livejournal.com
I really wish she wouldn't put multiple animated gifs in one post. Modern graphics cards aren't optimised for animated gifs, it would appear, so that makes my laptop's fan spin up quite dramatically, and they're large enough that it takes quite a while for them all to load in parallel.

Date: 2012-05-05 12:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
US Court rules you can be fired for a Facebook "Like".

*headache* I thought I had started to follow US employment law, but apparently not.

As I understand it, you can usually be fired for any form of free speech, with exceptions if you have a decent employment contract, if you're (under some circumstances) discussing working conditions, if it's a matter of discriminating based on a protected class (race, gender, etc). Possibly under some circumstances political views? And some other things?

I think what this case seems to say is that the government is allowed to fire you (or, for that matter, in principle, pass laws criminalising you for) facebook likes.

However, it seems like this is a local court, and we really hope that the precedent won't get supported by higher courts...

I was very lucky to find a link to a transcript http://www.scribd.com/doc/91406670/Bland-v-Roberts-4-11cv45-E-D-Va-Apr-24-2012 from another news article http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2012/04/facebook-likes-arent-speech-protected-by-the-first-amendment-rules-judge.ars but haven't waded through it.

Date: 2012-05-05 12:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] artkouros.livejournal.com
It's my experience that the greater the energy of the particle accelerator the better the cafeteria food.

Date: 2012-05-05 01:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] spacelem.livejournal.com
No problems with body hair over here! Actually I wish more people would go natural.

Date: 2012-05-05 03:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jfargo.livejournal.com
I'm not allowed to have children for fear that I would do things like that comic, or run linguistic experiments on them. My argument of "it would be AWESOME" just doesn't sit well with the scientific community.

Date: 2012-05-05 07:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kurosau.livejournal.com
Why would it be impractical for anyone with children? You just slot them in along with the adult, instead of seating them by their own seat. The anomaly shouldn't interrupt the overall system.

Date: 2012-05-05 09:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] errolwi.livejournal.com
The system needs to know which seats have already been occupied (so it can display it to the next group gathering). You can't just put pressure sensors in the actual seats, not least because the 'I'm taken' indicator needs to be displayed before the seats are actually occupied. Kids not standing in the right place mucks up the indications.

Date: 2012-05-05 09:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kurosau.livejournal.com
The system should work properly without any feedback indicators, as the separation between the participants should work with a few anomalies thrown in and anyone that slips out of line should be easy to fill in later.

The reason this idea works better is because it doesn't have people pushing past each other or competing over the same overhead space. I'm fairly certain I read about a similar idea in Cracked a while back that didn't involve any sensors or carpet.

Date: 2012-05-06 01:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] errolwi.livejournal.com
For some reason I was thinking it was unallocated seating. You're right, with allocated seating it can handle some anomalies I expect.

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 29th, 2025 01:28 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios