Interesting Links for 30-04-2012
Apr. 30th, 2012 12:00 pm- Defendant's gender affects length of sentence (and believability of evidence)
- German manufacturing shrinks at fastest pace since 2009
- The security around the 2012 olympics has left reality long behind it
- The planned obsolescence of the Apple ecosystem
- A longer version of Neil Gaiman's interview of Stephen King
- CISPA is a threat to the world
- It is, apparently, possible to think that Animal Farm had a happy ending
- The only bisexual in the village
- Judge Dredd – The Complete Case Files 01 (a review)
- UK Border Authority accused of covering up airport delays, tries to ban photographs of queues
- Tax is complicated - a reasonable suggestion for the Pasty Tax.
no subject
Date: 2012-04-30 11:09 am (UTC)The iPod touch is almost five years old. My officemate's HTC Android phone, which is still under contract, is suffering from exactly the same problem due to Android fragmentation, and he can't replace it because it's too recent. When comparing a company that doesn't support five-year-old hardware and a company that doesn't support still-in-warranty hardware, it would seem obvious which has the greater problem with obsolescence.
no subject
Date: 2012-04-30 11:15 am (UTC)The advantage the iPhone has in this situation) is that there are fewer combinations of hardware/software to deal with.
The advantage Android has is that you can make older versions of the software available on a website, if the publishers wanted to.
no subject
Date: 2012-04-30 11:29 am (UTC)Marco Arment, the Instapaper developer, wrote that requiring iOS 4 was a good idea. He concludes "iOS 4+ adoption, now at 98.8%, is so ubiquitous that it’s very safe to require it." All devices other than the original iPhone and iPod can run iOS 4, and so for most developers there's no benefit to providing a concession for people running versions beneath that.
The author of the article you link to is using a first-gen iPod Touch, which accounts for 0.16% of the traffic described in that article. That just isn't a worthwhile investment for any developer, and anyone still running an iPod touch is going to have to be aware of that.
I do wish that the App Store could limit searches to what will work on your device though - it removes apps that are for different iOS devices, so why it couldn't work for different iOS versions is beyond me.
no subject
Date: 2012-04-30 11:51 am (UTC)I agree that it may well not be worth it to support older versions - sometimes it is, sometimes it isn't, but having the option would be good.
After all, some people are happy to make apps available purely because they scratch an itch, and if it's just an install file sittign on a webserver, taking up a negligible amount of space, you might be happy to leave it there.
(Particularly with open source or ad-supported apps)
no subject
Date: 2012-04-30 01:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-30 01:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-30 07:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-30 11:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-30 11:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-30 11:45 am (UTC)Wow. I thought "Animal Farm Napoleon = Stalin = bad" was the one interpretation no-one could disagree with. Apparently not!
no subject
Date: 2012-04-30 01:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-30 05:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-01 09:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-30 07:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-01 08:13 am (UTC)