Date: 2012-03-24 12:26 am (UTC)
matgb: Artwork of 19th century upper class anarchist, text: MatGB (Default)
From: [personal profile] matgb
Surely the question re Symbian %age new sales share is not "how has it fallen so low" but instead "why did it take so long to fall"?

That it was still beating iOS in sales in the tail end of 2011 was sacry wrong given how long it'd been cancelled.

Heh, new Symbian Belle update has an improved low power mode. Prioritise 2G, only go online when I ask it to, I can get 8-10 days battery life in my N8...

Date: 2012-03-22 11:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bart-calendar.livejournal.com
I think you guys should put Alan Moore on a tenner just to piss him off.

Date: 2012-03-22 12:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bart-calendar.livejournal.com
Hey, did you notice that a Hellmouth is opening up in a Wisconsin town?

Space Trams

Date: 2012-03-22 01:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] danieldwilliam.livejournal.com
$60 billion is a lot of money until…

… you remember that by 2050 there will be some 10 billion people living on Earth and at least half of them will have a standard of living equal to or more than the per capita GDP of the USA when it built the Space Shuttle (or failing that Apollo(2))

And that if 1 person in 100 of the those 10 billion spent just 1% of their per capita GDP on stuff that happens in space(3) that is about $21bn per annum on space stuff

And this thing should last 100 years.

$60bn to drop the cost of cost of getting stuff up there by a factor of 200 for a hundred years.


Basically, building a Space Tram is pocket change…

…until…

… you ask an Edinburgh cabby about trams.

Time to put SpaceTram on kickstarter.


(1) $26k in 2005 US$
(2) $21k in 2005 US$
(3) be that GPS sats, com sats, spy sats, medical research, charitable or state giving to pure research, Big Brother in Space entertainment.

Date: 2012-03-22 06:05 pm (UTC)
ext_58972: Mad! (Default)
From: [identity profile] autopope.livejournal.com
The star tram idea lost me at the "if we have a superconducting cable carrying 200 million amperes" point.

It's a bit like saying "if we have a working He3 aneutronic fusion reactor" -- theoretically possible, but oy are there some minor engineering problems in the way!

Date: 2012-03-22 10:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] danieldwilliam.livejournal.com
I thought there were significant advantages of launching things near the equator.

I was thinking the Northern Territory would be a better location.

Date: 2012-03-22 10:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] danieldwilliam.livejournal.com
Did any of those comments include the difficulty of wielding a spanner in minus 50 degrees C?

Or the corrosive power of penguin crap?

Date: 2012-03-23 12:01 am (UTC)
fearmeforiampink: (death ray)
From: [personal profile] fearmeforiampink
To quote [livejournal.com profile] dainul, a physicist friend of mine:

Love their suggestion for keeping it up. Surely no-one would object to having several hundreds of miles of cabling generating a magnetic field equivalent to being inside an NMR machine at a distance of ~ 170m?

If we assume 200 km of such a cable (depending on the angle of inline and so forth - this is about 125 miles) we'd be looking at somewhere in the region of 100 square km in which most modern electronics would not work. More descriptively, we'd be looking at 100 square kilometers in which they'd have to prevent anyone taking any magnetic metals, as any such material unless properly secured would be accelerated into the superconducting cable, probably shutting it down (possibly quite explosively) as its cooling jacket was ruptured. Que the levitated cable crashing down to earth.

And this is supposed to be feasible?

Date: 2012-03-22 06:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
I did wonder which bits of the idea were like that. OTOH, they claim phase one is to simply try to build one that ends by going up a mountain: that sounded less implausible to me, but I don't know if it's actually _plausible_ without a lot of new technology?

Date: 2012-03-24 12:06 pm (UTC)
ext_58972: Mad! (Default)
From: [identity profile] autopope.livejournal.com
The trouble with going up a mountain is that we don't have any sufficiently high mountains. Everest nearly reaches the tropopause -- the boundary between the troposphere and the stratosphere -- but not quite. And I suspect there'd be a slight out-cry if anyone proposed building a railgun up the side of Everest, let alone the happy fun failure modes when your launch trajectory (west to east) happens to fail for a payload passing over China.

And even if you poke your railgun muzzle up into the stratosphere, you're going to need a heat shield on your payloads because the frictional heating of punching through air (even at 10% of ground level pressure) at Mach 20 is not insubstantial.

Edit: There is a place where this scheme might be practical, of course ... on Mars, specifically up the flank of Olympus Mons. At the summit you're near-as-dammit in hard vacuum, and you don't need anything like as long a run-up anyway because orbital velocity on Mars is a lot lower than on Earth.
Edited Date: 2012-03-24 12:07 pm (UTC)

Date: 2012-04-15 03:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skreidle.livejournal.com
Dangit, you linked to page 2 at "Introducing a non-gamer to roleplaying. I really liked this." :P

Date: 2012-04-15 07:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skreidle.livejournal.com
I've been catching up on old links -- most of them your daily linkdumps. :D

February 2026

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 13th, 2026 11:44 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios