andrewducker: (Default)
[personal profile] andrewducker

Date: 2012-02-21 11:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] danieldwilliam.livejournal.com
I think transporting water around the UK is going to be very, very, very expensive and we'd be better served spending the money on demand reduction.

Or relocating some of our industry and population to parts of the country with water.
Edited Date: 2012-02-21 11:18 am (UTC)

Date: 2012-02-21 11:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] danieldwilliam.livejournal.com
It is unclear to me how men not seeing the advert on Oxford Street will make them aware of gender discrimination.

Date: 2012-02-21 12:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] danieldwilliam.livejournal.com
Sorry, what I'm not clear about from the article is how I, approaching the advert as a man, will be aware that I am not seeing it in all its glory. What will I experience that will make me aware that, were I not a man (90% of the time) I would see something different / better?

Date: 2012-02-21 12:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] danieldwilliam.livejournal.com
Ah, right.

and this is the point where it tells me that as I'm a man I can't see the content?

(Or rather, this is the point where it tells me that, according to the prevailing gender culture, it is broken.)

Date: 2012-02-21 03:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alextfish.livejournal.com
That was my impression, yes. If you press the button and it thinks you're a man, it'll say "Sorry, you can't see this ad. Visit our website instead to learn more."

Date: 2012-02-21 03:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] danieldwilliam.livejournal.com
The responses to that will be interesting.

Date: 2012-02-21 04:33 pm (UTC)
tobyaw: (Default)
From: [personal profile] tobyaw
Anything that helps to hide adverts from me is a good thing.

Isn’t it discriminating against women by playing them an advert that men can avoid?

Date: 2012-02-22 09:40 am (UTC)
simont: A picture of me in 2016 (Default)
From: [personal profile] simont
Yes, I was thinking that sort of thing. And even for women, it apparently won't play them an advert unless they deliberately interact with it in some way.

A billboard which doesn't bother you unless you bother it first? Best kind!

Date: 2012-02-21 05:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] undeadbydawn.livejournal.com
dear games website:

the most likely result of you needlessly splitting an article over several pages is that I will only read the first page. Which is fucking irritating. Stop it.
Back to the point, though - I remember a flood of angry letters to the Official PS Mag when FFIX was given 9/10 for being 'too much like other FF games', while the most recent Tomb Raider sequel was given a perfect 10/10. I was also bloody furious about it, primarily because it was editorially inconsistent. If you're punishing a good game for being a sequel, you should punish a mediocre game for being a sequel.

the video ad: would serve mostly to remind me why I don't have a TV, and why I rip DVDs. Clever enough to be entirely self-defeating. The one thing I will not do is remember to [or pull my phone out and] check a website because a bus-stop told me to.

Date: 2012-02-21 05:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] undeadbydawn.livejournal.com
recent best estimates are that 60% of water piped in England is lost via damaged pipes.

fixing the infrastructure [which is massively expensive] would do rather a lot to cure existing drought levels, with no need for piping in from the north.
Scotland also sells rather a lot its surplus supply to England already.

[my data is almost certainly out of date, can't be bothered checking]

Date: 2012-02-21 06:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alitheapipkin.livejournal.com
I don't know the actual figures o losses but I seem to remember that Seven Trent Water, who serve my parental home, got fined last year for failing to meet targets to reduce losses from damaged pipes despite increasing prices to cover infrastructure improvements.

Date: 2012-02-22 03:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] d-c-m.livejournal.com
Losing weight twice as difficult as diets claim. Plus, of course, temporary diets are really bad for you, and don't work long term

Oh great....

Date: 2012-03-02 07:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skreidle.livejournal.com
Just finished reading "Sauerkraut Station", and that really was excellent. :)

February 2026

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22232425262728

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 22nd, 2026 04:44 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios