Better Health
May. 9th, 2003 09:38 amI'm totally fed up with people who say that Labour have made no difference and have done exactly what the Conservatives would have done.
The introduction of a minimum wage, the removal of hereditary membership of the house of lords, vastly increased spending on the NHS and dozens of other projects have all come through.
Aha, they say, but despite the claims of increased NHS funding, it's still no good.
Wrong! You can read about the improvements here.
The introduction of a minimum wage, the removal of hereditary membership of the house of lords, vastly increased spending on the NHS and dozens of other projects have all come through.
Aha, they say, but despite the claims of increased NHS funding, it's still no good.
Wrong! You can read about the improvements here.
New premises, technology, and modern equipment mean much better care for patients than 10 years ago, it says.
But improvements remain "patchy", with continuing staff shortages and some dirty premises.
CHI's chair Dame Deirdre Hine told BBC Radio 4's Today programme there had been "tremendous advances" in many areas.
She said: "People are getting treated faster, getting treated with very up-to-date methods of treatment and, in particular, they're being given a lot more information."
no subject
Date: 2003-05-09 02:24 am (UTC)As a whole I think Labours handling of the NHS has been poor.
no subject
Date: 2003-05-09 02:43 am (UTC)Oh, and centralisation is good in some ways - if the whole of the NHS used the same computer systems they'd save a fortune.
And of course flooding it with money is helping - but the Conservatives cut the money back, while Labour increased it. That's a plus point for Labour...
Re:
Date: 2003-05-09 02:49 am (UTC)The NHS has been a lose - lose situation for Labour. Im still annoyed at theyre manifesto claims, god was it 6 years ago?