Page Summary
Active Entries
- 1: Interesting Links for 05-06-2025
- 2: Interesting Links for 09-06-2025
- 3: Photo cross-post
- 4: Interesting Links for 08-06-2025
- 5: History Repeating Itself (Labour and ID cards edition)
- 6: Interesting Links for 06-06-2025
- 7: Interesting Links for 07-06-2025
- 8: The Sickening Has Me
- 9: Interesting Links for 04-06-2025
- 10: Why does Edinburgh Council hate cars?
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2011-10-21 08:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-21 08:35 pm (UTC)Currently playing Borderlands with Julie, and Batman: Arkham Asylum by myself.
MMOing may resume when Julie has her life back :->
no subject
Date: 2011-10-21 09:13 pm (UTC)I mean, um, actually, that sounds awesome to me[1], but I can see why people used to WoW might be rather shocked.
[1] My impression of Kung Fu Panda was that the plot was nice but a bit short, everything apart from the main character (the concept, the setting, the other characters, the animation, the plot) was really great, and the main character was 50% Jack Black being pretty good and 50% being Jack Black being really annoying when he was trying to be funny. So, Kung Fu Panda without the Panda sounds very cool :)
no subject
Date: 2011-10-21 09:57 pm (UTC)And I liked Kung Fu Panda (and its sequel) rather a lot. It just seems that they've based a whole chunk of WoW on a major existing property without, well, licensing it, or anything like that.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-21 10:19 pm (UTC)It is hilarious, though, that they are ACTUALLY doing panda people, having used them as a running joke for April Fools announcements...
(I don't play WoW, I've just been amused by my gaming bloglist imploding with WTF this evening)
no subject
Date: 2011-10-22 01:39 am (UTC)They've been detailed to a reasonable degree in some of the extended stuff; the D20 RPG version, for instance.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-28 11:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-21 10:22 pm (UTC)Believe me, the Pandas aren't the most surprising bit of what they've announced. Fighting Minipet Subgame? Really?
no subject
Date: 2011-10-21 10:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-22 01:49 am (UTC)I don't know the specifics, but the main reason they've not been in it so far has been (as I understand it) something to do with Chinese laws meaning you can't show people beating up pandas. Indeed, they were previously (and I think in other previous references to Pandarens) more Japanese than Chinese in their cultural references, but given that China is where the Pandas come from, that didn't go down well with their Chinese audience, so they've pushed them back towards China.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-22 10:33 am (UTC)However, looking at the Mists of Pandaria video - it's INCREDIBLY close to Kung Fu Panda in theme and visual style. Obviously, KFP was in turn influenced by kung fu movies and Chinese culture, but MoP is SO close to KFP in visual style that I still think they're taking a non-trivial risk. And you can't claim prior art as a defence in copyright.
I guess they might be planning to, if the makers of KFP sue, counter-sue on the basis that KFP was copying the Pandaren. Might work.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-22 10:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-23 07:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-23 08:00 pm (UTC)Of course, they may both be using the same sources. But I'm sceptical...
no subject
Date: 2011-10-23 08:02 pm (UTC)Regardless of originality, it has mystic pandas, ha ha ha ha ha ha.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-23 08:08 pm (UTC)