andrewducker: (Default)
[personal profile] andrewducker
Having, during discussion with [livejournal.com profile] simont and [livejournal.com profile] call_waiting in my previous post about c# method overload resolution, reached a reasonably good understanding of what the compiler was doing, I did what any sensible person would do. Something you couldn't easily do 20 years ago. I emailed one of the compiler writers, Eric Lippert, and asked him why it worked that way.

And he emailed me back saying, yes, it was a deliberate decision. And here was his blog post from 2007 explaining it.

Now that's service!

Date: 2010-04-06 06:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] call-waiting.livejournal.com
Ah! Now that makes a lot of sense. Hm. I'm sure there's probably a different way around the problem than fritzing with the method resolution rules, though. It seems rather heavy-handed.

March 2026

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 56 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 15th, 2026 08:32 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios