andrewducker: (Default)
[personal profile] andrewducker

Date: 2009-08-05 11:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] channelpenguin.livejournal.com
On the autism thing - I wonder did they test with genuine body language or acting? It would make a hell of a difference. I am not autistic, nor even (so far as I know) particularly AS, but I have always had a great deal of trouble when people's words/own perceptions/explanations of their emotions/mood/thoughts are mismatched with what their body says. It made me doubt for a very long time that I could read people at all... which type of thing would make it so much harder if it was going on. I have a vauge muttering in the back of my head - I wonder do autistic people do well or badly with reading the emotions/intentions of animals?

Incidentally, I'll go with body language every single time now, observing people as you would wildlife and ignoring the chatter seems to work pretty well for me(there have been some good experiments on that too as I recall).

Date: 2009-08-05 11:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] channelpenguin.livejournal.com
I know they used dots - but they got the dot patterns representing the body language from somewhere. I can't make the videos out properly on the BBC site.

The difference in the random shift/ shift to right-left perception does argue for a perceptual issue though. Anyone got any better writeup?

Date: 2009-08-05 11:38 am (UTC)
drplokta: (Default)
From: [personal profile] drplokta
The tax link is incomplete. The difference between benefits and negative taxes is purely semantic (you could just rename "Child Benefit" as "Children's VAT Rebate", for example) , so you have to look at benefits as well as taxes in determining whether or not we have progressive taxation. According to the figures in the link, the poorest quintile end up with a net after-tax-and-benefit income that's over three times their before-tax-and-benefit income (including benefits in kind such as health care and education), while the richest quintile have an after-tax-and-benefit income of around 70% of their before-tax-and-benefit income. So effective tax rates go from -200% to +30%, which looks pretty progressive to me.

Date: 2009-08-05 05:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marrog.livejournal.com
Good links today. Also eeeeeeee @ Rachel Weisz. I get a happy little skip every time I see her. She's fab.

March 2026

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 56 7
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 8th, 2026 12:27 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios