andrewducker: (Default)
[personal profile] andrewducker

Date: 2009-01-18 07:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kurosau.livejournal.com
There's a reason they called everyone that pitched into save those people heroes. It's because they were.

But given how bad things could've gone independently of what we could do to control it? I'm finding Brad's article a poor game of irrationally emotional semantics.

Date: 2009-01-18 07:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kurosau.livejournal.com
Yes he does, but that's also why I separated my comment into two points. Independent of them being heroes, they still could've lost any number of those people. I don't think calling it a miracle is far off the mark or even a bad thing.

Or, to put it another way, I used to occasionally get pissed when they called people heroes or said stuff was a miracle too. I got over that phase.

Date: 2009-01-18 08:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anton-p-nym.livejournal.com
You are fortunate that you don't hear the dog-whistle overtone to "miracle" that Brad does, seeing that he lives on the fringes of Jesusland. I think he is (and, given what I've read about circumstances there, I am as well) very much concerned about the attitude that lead to New Orleans' destruction.

-- Steve notes that "miracle" connotes to a happening beyond human control, and THAT is what Brad is objecting too. There was some luck over the Hudson that day, but the results of that landing were very much borne of human practice.

PS: I think the best lesson we can take from that crash is, "Chance favours the prepared mind;" that's something you don't get from calling it a miracle.

September 2025

S M T W T F S
  12 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 15th, 2025 11:47 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios