Local Income Tax - request for information
Sep. 4th, 2008 11:06 amCan anyone point me at information about the Local Income Tax proposals? Specifically I'd like to know if it only applies to income that is currently affected by income tax - i.e. does it affect the first few thousand pounds of income?
no subject
Date: 2008-09-04 10:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-04 10:33 am (UTC)As far as I know the precise figures have not been published, presumably because they have yet work out the fine details. There is already a dispute with Westminster to be resolved. Salmond was on Radio 4 this morning and the point was raised that if there is no council tax, the Treasury have indicated they will withdraw all payment of COuncil Tax Benefit, which would create a £400 million defecit, Salmond wants that money to continue. There must be a lot of fine detail to work out yet.
There are a lot of questions to be answered. I'm also curious how they are going to prevent any high-earners who own more than one home from simply declaring they live in England.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-04 10:34 am (UTC)So yeah, same personal allowances and 10% and 40% bands as the rest of the UK, but basic rate band taxed at 23% instead of 20%.
Para 7.13 of http://www.scotland.gov.uk/government/devolution/scpa-10.asp covers this (although it's not the actual legislative text).
no subject
Date: 2008-09-04 10:37 am (UTC)http://www2.snp.org/html/multimedia/speeches.php
no subject
Date: 2008-09-04 11:10 am (UTC)The plans for the bill aren't detailed - so the best you can go on is the consultation document.
It hasn't been decided whether to have the same personal allowance as UK income tax - though the consultation has that as a proposal.
Also, the rate of tax - stated yesterday (and in the consultation document) at 3p/£ - is probably way too low - this paper and this one suggest a rate of 5p to 8p might be more reasonable.
The Scottish Government's proposal in the consultation paper also suggests that the "local" income tax will only be charged on earned income - so contractors such as myself, who take profits from a business as dividends, won't pay half as much as they otherwise would. This is, frankly, crazy - but since the Scottish Government wants to take the tax through PAYE, it is the only way to do it.
I believe the likelihood of the bill being passed is so slender to be non-existent: it is really political posturing.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-04 11:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-04 11:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-04 11:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-04 11:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-04 11:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-04 11:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-04 11:50 am (UTC)I've worked mine out based on entire household income (including the part I'm not currently taxed on) and we wouldn't be any better off, but we also wouldn't be any worse off. However, my mother, who doesn't quite qualify for council tax benefit yet struggles to pay council tax as she lives in a city centre house, would pay almost nothing* so would be massively better off. The knock effect is that I would be better off so the need for me to regularly pay her money to help her keep her head above the poverty line would be removed, and she wouldn't feel like she was having to take charity. So it's a huge win in my book.
On one hand, the SNP are looking like they're doing more to save me money than any other party - (prescription charges, reduced and will continue to reduce to zero as long as they're in power; bridge toll gone; hospital car parking gone... Council Tax on the verge of going). I voted for the SNP last time around, and I would do again (unless they really screw up between now and then). They're bringing change, whether right or wrong, which has been needed to shake Scotland and the Scottish parliament up for a while.
But on the other hand - where is the money coming from to pay for it all. I'm suspiscious. Very suspiscious. I failed O grade Arithmetic, but I'm struggling to make it all add up. And please don't someone bring north sea oil into this...
*Given the calculator on the SNP web site suggests my mother would pay next to nothing, I reckon it's only based on current taxable income.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-04 12:37 pm (UTC)This is likely to lead to arbitrage for those who are able to choose where they are based.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-04 12:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-04 12:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-04 12:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-04 12:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-04 01:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-04 01:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-04 02:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-04 02:39 pm (UTC)But I do think it would be awfully difficult - employers would need to keep track of who was where.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-04 02:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-04 02:50 pm (UTC)But it does mean that employers will need to run two different systems - one for employees living in Scotland, another for others. I understand that most payroll systems can cope with this - but the payroll department might not.
As you can probably tell, I am highly sceptical about this.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-04 02:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-04 03:11 pm (UTC)In my view, it would make more sense to collect a local income tax through self assessment - enabling the inclusion of unearned income, but that would also make it easier to evade.
Another thing about a local income tax is that it would make the revenue generated for authorities less predictable: a property tax (be it rate, land value tax or council tax or ...) will provide pretty steady income, whilst the funds generated by an income tax is likely fall in times of economic contraction (such as now), when councils would want stability. This might have the effect of amplifying a contraction (if councils have to cut back on spending when consumers and businesses are already doing so). [Sorry to keep going on - I am afraid I find the concepts behind taxation quite interesting!]
no subject
Date: 2008-09-04 03:17 pm (UTC)And dropping taxes is the equivalent of giving a cash injection to the people that need it most (those that just lost their jobs/took paycuts). It's doing the government's job for them!
no subject
Date: 2008-09-04 04:03 pm (UTC)