Page Summary
cybik.livejournal.com - (no subject)
drjon.livejournal.com - (no subject)
accordingly.livejournal.com - (no subject)
hirez.livejournal.com - (no subject)
nwhyte - (no subject)
ekatarina.livejournal.com - (no subject)
pseudomonas.livejournal.com - (no subject)
terminalmalaise.livejournal.com - (no subject)
erindubitably.livejournal.com - (no subject)
surliminal.livejournal.com - (no subject)
cosmolinguist - (no subject)
mirukux.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Active Entries
- 1: Photo cross-post
- 2: Interesting Links for 22-08-2025 (and the previous day)
- 3: It's the little things
- 4: An auspicious beginning
- 5: Life with two kids: Less reassuring than you might expect
- 6: Interesting Links for 20-08-2025
- 7: Interesting Links for 15-08-2025
- 8: Photo cross-post
- 9: Interesting Links for 19-08-2025
- 10: Interesting Links for 16-08-2025
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2008-07-16 01:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-16 01:45 pm (UTC)Sometimes kinda wish I could get my hands on the source, and brush up on my coding. But who has time?
no subject
Date: 2008-07-16 01:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-16 02:06 pm (UTC)(fires it up to have another look)
I find the interface poorly designed, counterintuitive, crowded and confusing. No doubt it would grow more familiar if I used it, but frankly I find it annoying. I hope my comments don't cause offense (I see in the poll answers now you use it.. sorry).
(I also use Notepad in preference to Word, btw.)
no subject
Date: 2008-07-16 02:11 pm (UTC)It's not perfect, and I'm sure there are things that I don't need in it. I was merely curious to get other people's opinions.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-16 02:18 pm (UTC)I have a vi implementation for windows around here somewhere...
no subject
Date: 2008-07-16 02:28 pm (UTC)(Notepad, I use over Word for most things, but I find that programs like EditPlus are simply better plain text editors. That doesn't stop me from using notepad for super-simple things, of course, but it's never my choice for anything more than a "need to take notes right here, right now" typing.)
no subject
Date: 2008-07-16 02:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-16 02:33 pm (UTC)I like Editplus because it translates seamlessly from a notepad-like text editor into a context-highlighting code-editing development environment, depending on what I open and how I work things. It gives me all the power I need for big stuff, and yet doesn't slow me down for small stuff.
And it's possible there's a free tool that does the same things, but I know, like, and have paid for this one.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-16 02:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-16 04:51 pm (UTC)So the correct answer to Andrew's poll is, for the posts I myself write, about 50/50 update/DS, but then there are auto posts from delicious and twitter that sometimes appear and have at times been the main content. Neither of which is an option above...
no subject
Date: 2008-07-16 09:17 pm (UTC)I like semagic for the keyboard shortcuts. Being able to copy a link to the clipboard, select some text, and hitting ctrl-alt-l to turn it into a link, or selecting matgb and typing ctrl-alt-u to convert it into a username link, etc.
Does Deepest Sender do that?
no subject
Date: 2008-07-16 09:45 pm (UTC)Because they're easily fully programmable, you can do things like footnote references as well as basic stuff like insert link, etc. But that's for addons, not DS.
DS will do username inserts, but for links I either right click/send to DS after highlighting, so it gives me a link preformatted with the page title and the text in a blockquote, or I use Copy as HTML link saving a process anyway—I keep meaning to write up all my favourite blogging plugins in one post, but, well, I haven't posted for a week...
no subject
Date: 2008-07-31 06:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-31 06:28 pm (UTC)To edit them, right click on the stuff in the statusbar, settings, then you want the little cross, the rest is self explanatory, I completely reprogrammed all of mine (hence the number of footnotes and stuff I put in posts, all done by insets)
no subject
Date: 2008-07-31 10:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-31 10:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-16 02:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-16 02:18 pm (UTC)[x] Logjam (Before the Mac)
no subject
Date: 2008-07-16 02:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-16 02:41 pm (UTC)Yes, Semagic's a dog's breakfast. All of the bells & whistles take up far too much screen. While you can hide that part of the dialog with F5, it's a bit rubbish. On the other hand it mostly works.
Logjam's nicer in that regard, although being a GTK+ app, it does pull in half of Gnome if you want to run it on a KDE box.
There is no LJ client for KDE[1]. Or rather, one that speaks Blogger ought to work. I wrote my own in the end because I wanted all the LJ-specific bits to work.
XJournal works well enough. Vague compromise between Logjam and Semagic, in that it could take up a lot less screen-space if one could replace the icons with text.
(But then I prefer my text-mangling apps to be very little else than the text-input widget itself.)
[1] The last time I looked.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-16 04:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-16 06:58 pm (UTC)s/box/rig/
You'd think that mind, given the fun I had getting some non-packaged apps to run under FreeBSD. Still, the meta-port for 3.x was Good Enough. I know not the state of 4.x, though.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-16 02:22 pm (UTC)I use Semagic for long posts which I'm afraid of losing from the update page.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-16 02:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-16 02:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-16 02:38 pm (UTC)Otherwise, the update button works for me.
Ekatarina
no subject
Date: 2008-07-16 02:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-16 03:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-16 03:56 pm (UTC)From work: update page
no subject
Date: 2008-07-16 07:19 pm (UTC)How about, y know, LIFE!!!!
no subject
Date: 2008-07-16 07:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-16 09:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-17 03:11 am (UTC)