More than any other film, The Fountain reminds me of "The Wall". Not because of any musical similarities, or similarities in plot, dialogue, or theme, but because they both leave the comfortable area of "Movie as story" and become meditations upon a subject. In both cases the films are more designed to convey a set of emotions than they are to follow any particular narrative. Which isn't to say that they don't both have narrative - in fact The Fountain has a very simple storyline - but in neither case is the plot the point. Just be aware that expecting clarity of plot will leave you feeling dissatisfied.
The Fountain is a meditation on the subjects of death and loss, and how people react to them. It tells the intertwined stories of Tommy (Hugh Jackman) and Izzy (Rachel Weisz) in the year 1500, 2000 and 2500, as he searches for eternal life for himself and the one he loves. The methods of avoiding death vary from strand to strand, but the driving force behind Tommy's character remains the same. Slowly we discover how these stories are linked, as Tommy approaches his goal(s).
The film is poetic, visually incredible, and deeply spiritual in the same way that, say, 2001 is. It's not flawless by any means, but it haunts the mind, and I'm going to have to see it again before I feel at all comfortable to judge it fully.
The only thing I'd change is that in the present-day plotline I wouldn't have had the final results of the experiment turn out the way they did. It turns the outcome for Izzy into an accident of timing rather than a necessity of life. Cutting those 6 seconds from the film would have made it work significantly better for me.
The Fountain is a meditation on the subjects of death and loss, and how people react to them. It tells the intertwined stories of Tommy (Hugh Jackman) and Izzy (Rachel Weisz) in the year 1500, 2000 and 2500, as he searches for eternal life for himself and the one he loves. The methods of avoiding death vary from strand to strand, but the driving force behind Tommy's character remains the same. Slowly we discover how these stories are linked, as Tommy approaches his goal(s).
The film is poetic, visually incredible, and deeply spiritual in the same way that, say, 2001 is. It's not flawless by any means, but it haunts the mind, and I'm going to have to see it again before I feel at all comfortable to judge it fully.
The only thing I'd change is that in the present-day plotline I wouldn't have had the final results of the experiment turn out the way they did. It turns the outcome for Izzy into an accident of timing rather than a necessity of life. Cutting those 6 seconds from the film would have made it work significantly better for me.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-28 11:43 am (UTC)In a meta way, I think the combination of the incredible beauty and music, that seem to appeal solely to the emotions might be Aronofsky's way of celebrating life and humanity, which is what makes it viably 'good art' for me.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-28 11:59 am (UTC)I'd like to see it.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-28 12:31 pm (UTC)Too much woo woo, as
no subject
Date: 2007-01-28 12:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-28 12:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-28 12:59 pm (UTC)I didn't see any mystical stuff in it at all. All looked solidly real to me - except for the stuff that was explicitly fictional, or in his head.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-28 04:08 pm (UTC)The Fountain
Date: 2007-01-28 07:04 pm (UTC)saw the film last night and read your comments, there was only about 25 people in the cinema when it finished and not one person said a word or got up when the credits came on.
When we finally left I listened in om the conversations and it reminded me of of the discussions we all had after Jurassic Park back at your parents ages ago once we all watched it.
Found an interesting forum discussing the film
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/vine/showthread.php?t=522647
have a look.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-28 09:33 pm (UTC)One of these things is not like the others.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-28 09:37 pm (UTC)(I must hang around people who use these phrases, or something. my sense of the word has nuance, which makes it different from, say, "fluffy bunnyism", which might sound ostensibly similar, otherwise...)
no subject
Date: 2007-01-28 09:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-28 09:43 pm (UTC)Personally, I think there's certain kind of emotionalism -- priviledging emotion over all other forms of knowledge and elevating it to near-mystical levels -- which distinguishes woo-woo from emotional depth in films. The Fountain veered precariously close to the line, and then kinda leaped over it, and back again, willy nilly.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-28 10:07 pm (UTC)Re: The Fountain
Date: 2007-01-28 10:24 pm (UTC)Cheers for the link too - I totally agree with what the first poster there says!
no subject
Date: 2007-01-29 03:37 pm (UTC)