andrewducker (
andrewducker) wrote2004-11-05 07:19 pm
More maps
I'm gonna cut these because, y'know, too many maps :->
Most states were actually _very_ close

Here's a map showing the results in more detail.
And here's a cool map showing where the population centers are:

Most states were actually _very_ close

Here's a map showing the results in more detail.
And here's a cool map showing where the population centers are:

no subject
That's really interesting - contrasts the electoral college vote vs the percentage vote.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
What's the situation over there like at present? I might need a bolt hole, I keep opening me mouth the way I've been doing...
no subject
You mean the job situation? Reasonable, I guess. Watch out for the stampede though...
http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5478,11303660%255E1702,00.html
no subject
*mutter mutter*
no subject
no subject
To really OT the thread, I've found it odd that I've never knowingly met a Kiwi emmigrant I did not like, and I've never knowingly met a Tasmanian emmigrant I did like - although I've met and liked Tasmanian immigrants, and those who've immigrated and subsequently emmigrated.
It's a shame I can't use "native" in that sentence, isn't it. It'd make things a whole lot clearer - but I'm sure you'll puzzle my meaning out...
no subject
Yeah. :-( I've never really put my figure on why out histories are quite a bit different, other than we were colonized about 50 years after you and attitudes had progressed a bit further by then.
Hmmm... Okay, your bicentenary was in 1988, so Australia began (so to speak:) in 1788, and NZ in 1840 (with the Treaty of Waitangi). That gap is exactly when Wiliam Wilberforce was active against slavery, he introducing his first bill against it in 1788 (defeated) and the last one in 1833, resulting in the abolition of all slavery in British territories...
http://justus.anglican.org/resources/bio/214.html
So, a major change in British attitudes during that period has to have something to do with it.
no subject
no subject
i don't mean that the latter position doesn't have its value - it's an indispensable tool when you get down to basic survival, which the reasonably well-off rarely experience - but that in turn means that if you're even *reasonably* well-off you should really have grown the fuck up by now and learned to get along with those who disagree with you and look after those less well-off than yourself.
to round up a long story with a short one, then, high pop. density makes you democrat. in my not very humble opinion.