1) Stan Freberg on one of his comedy albums read 18th-century long s as an f, as a joke. To transcribe it that way in a serious article is just ignorant.
If you're transcribing such a text today, use a short s. That's what's usually done. The long s is an old typographical custom, not an inherent quality of the text.
Oh, of course that should be the default. I meant if one wishes for some reason to indicate that a long s is being used (either stylistically, or for discussing the typography or paleography or whatever)
no subject
no subject
I'm glad it wasn't just me that this grated on! It's not like unicode doesn't have a long s
ſcharacter. I'd even put up with an eshʃat a pinch.no subject
no subject
Oh, of course that should be the default. I meant if one wishes for some reason to indicate that a long s is being used (either stylistically, or for discussing the typography or paleography or whatever)
no subject
It’s weird that Asimov’s magazine is now science fact instead of science fiction …
(It seems to be a subsidiary of a biotech startup.)
no subject
But then again he wrote a lot of pop science books.
no subject
And an annotated edition of the complete works of Gilbert and Sullivan.