1) Stan Freberg on one of his comedy albums read 18th-century long s as an f, as a joke. To transcribe it that way in a serious article is just ignorant.
If you're transcribing such a text today, use a short s. That's what's usually done. The long s is an old typographical custom, not an inherent quality of the text.
Oh, of course that should be the default. I meant if one wishes for some reason to indicate that a long s is being used (either stylistically, or for discussing the typography or paleography or whatever)
no subject
no subject
It’s weird that Asimov’s magazine is now science fact instead of science fiction …
(It seems to be a subsidiary of a biotech startup.)
no subject
But then again he wrote a lot of pop science books.
no subject
I'm glad it wasn't just me that this grated on! It's not like unicode doesn't have a long s
ſcharacter. I'd even put up with an eshʃat a pinch.no subject
And an annotated edition of the complete works of Gilbert and Sullivan.
no subject
no subject
Oh, of course that should be the default. I meant if one wishes for some reason to indicate that a long s is being used (either stylistically, or for discussing the typography or paleography or whatever)