vargrave: (Default)

[personal profile] vargrave 2025-06-16 11:30 am (UTC)(link)
Saw this on the Latest Things page, and that second link is concerning, to say the least. I don't even know why I'm still surprised at this behaviour from Meta; it's par for the course from them.

Thanks for sharing.

[personal profile] anna_wing 2025-06-16 01:27 pm (UTC)(link)
A similar-in-principle technique is already applied to textile conservation. Print the missing/damaged bit onto a piece of clorh of similar weight and then weave it in by hand.
calimac: (Default)

[personal profile] calimac 2025-06-16 09:42 pm (UTC)(link)
1) “Because there’s a digital record of what mask was used, in 100 years, the next time someone is working with this, they’ll have an extremely clear understanding of what was done to the painting,”

You think your digital record of today will still be readable in 100 years?