andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2022-01-14 12:00 pm
dewline: Text - "On the DEWLine" (Default)

[personal profile] dewline 2022-01-14 12:37 pm (UTC)(link)
"Orwell on Politeness" might be more accurate.

I'll want to read the rest and comment on those later.
calimac: (Default)

[personal profile] calimac 2022-01-14 03:57 pm (UTC)(link)
It's been observed before that behavior derided as "politically correct" really is just politeness.
nancylebov: (green leaves)

[personal profile] nancylebov 2022-01-14 01:24 pm (UTC)(link)
I have doubts about the Mootrix. It seems possible, but if it were true, I think more people would be trying it, and more importantly, we'd get to see at least a screenshot of what the cows are seeing.
jack: (Default)

[personal profile] jack 2022-01-14 07:48 pm (UTC)(link)
I think it's the sort of thing where, I'm not surprised there might be something there, but on average I'd expect to see a bunch of ill-conceived attempts without very meaningful results first.
cmcmck: (Default)

[personal profile] cmcmck 2022-01-14 02:20 pm (UTC)(link)
Those dresses are gorgeous.

Nice to see something nice for once!
calimac: (Default)

[personal profile] calimac 2022-01-14 04:05 pm (UTC)(link)
"once more ... a separate party"? Well, no. The Scottish Unionists of the past were administratively separate from the rest of the Conservative party, but they never politically split. What we're talking about now is a political split.

Closest past equivalent in Scotland would be the Scottish Labour Party which split in 1976, and quickly sank into oblivion. The argument here is that a separate Scottish Conservative party would have more support than that, and maybe it would.

For clarity: the Ulster Unionist Party has always been administratively separate from the rest of the Conservatives as well, but it didn't politically split until 1972, at which time it itself was also splintering into separate groups like the DUP.