andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2019-06-30 03:29 pm

Interesting Links for 30-06-2019

dewline: Text - "On the DEWLine" (Default)

[personal profile] dewline 2019-06-30 02:33 pm (UTC)(link)
1. Horrific.

3. There's always precursor events before anything like the Stonewall (Uprising/Riots), isn't there?

9. I read about that. I'm sure the Reich-wingers' counterparts in other countries are working up their own versions of those lists. Such ambitions on their parts must be crushed.
momentsmusicaux: (Default)

[personal profile] momentsmusicaux 2019-07-01 08:55 am (UTC)(link)
> including the departure of the show’s leading man at the end of Season 1.

I actually think the departure of Sinclair vastly improved the story. Not because of the actor, but because of the whole Valen storyline that then came about.

I am curious though as to what shape the Valen story would have taken had Sinclair not left.
melchar: medieval raccoon girl (Default)

[personal profile] melchar 2019-07-06 01:55 am (UTC)(link)
I think the Valen storyline would still have played out - but I admire JMS for having actively planned for the loss of major actors in the show & having entire new story-loops for the replacement characters.
momentsmusicaux: (Default)

[personal profile] momentsmusicaux 2019-07-06 07:56 am (UTC)(link)
Yes, but WHO would have taken Babylon 4 into the past and transformed into Valen?

I read something once where JMS said he had what he called a trapdoor for every character -- a plan in case the actor died / left / whatever.
melchar: medieval raccoon girl (Default)

[personal profile] melchar 2019-07-06 09:40 am (UTC)(link)
My guess is that it would've still been Sinclair. The Sheridan-is-a-boyscout-NOT character arc is just too good to -not- use. It's just he came in a season or 2 earlier than planned.
jducoeur: (Default)

[personal profile] jducoeur 2019-07-10 06:18 pm (UTC)(link)
Don't know about the plans for Valen, but remember: Babylon 5 was always intended to be only the first half of the story. In the original plan, the second series took place a little while later, with Babylon 4 being shanghaied into the *future* to fight the next Great War. (IIRC, the series hewed fairly closely to the original plan for the first few seasons, and then went *way* off-course during the last two.)

So that scene with Sinclair looking 25 years older? I'm pretty sure it that the original intent was that it simply took place 25 years later, in a series where Sinclair was a secondary character and his son was the lead...
jack: (Default)

Boeing's 737 Max Software Outsourced to $9-an-Hour Engineers

[personal profile] jack 2019-07-01 10:31 am (UTC)(link)
It's terrifying. I don't know enough about reliability engineering -- I want to know what actually happened: I thought aerospace had a LOT of standards for testing and similar, how did this bypass all of them. The article mentioned having a principle of redundancy, of never relying on a single sensor. But I don't know, is that on a checklist somewhere, or was it understood by the engineering people but not part of a formal process, or what?
nancylebov: (green leaves)

Re: Boeing's 737 Max Software Outsourced to $9-an-Hour Engineers

[personal profile] nancylebov 2019-07-01 02:18 pm (UTC)(link)
There's a book called To Engineer is Human with the theory that new tech tends to be over-engineered, and as time goes on, people prune back on what they think is excessive caution until something goes badly wrong.
jack: (Default)

Re: Boeing's 737 Max Software Outsourced to $9-an-Hour Engineers

[personal profile] jack 2019-07-02 10:11 am (UTC)(link)
Ouch, that sounds plausible. But in this case I'd expect something like, "after much review, regulations were relaxed when it was decided that they were too conservative" or something, like happened with banking regulations. I don't know if that happened and just wasn't clear from the summary I read, or things followed a different path.
skington: (yum)

[personal profile] skington 2019-07-01 02:03 pm (UTC)(link)
There's a revised version of the three-halflings-in-a-trenchcoat fighter archetype.

As a rule of thumb, I tend to find that linking straight to Reddit, rather than someone's write-up of a Reddit thread, is nearly always better. Assuming you're linking to the good Reddit, of course, not the cesspool that is e.g. /r/The_Donald.